2014
DOI: 10.1190/geo2014-0325.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining fractal dimension from nuclear magnetic resonance data in rocks with internal magnetic field gradients

Abstract: Pore size distributions in rocks may be represented by fractal scaling, and fractal descriptions of pore systems may be used for prediction of petrophysical properties such as permeability, tortuosity, diffusivity, and electrical conductivity. Transverse relaxation time ([Formula: see text]) distributions determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements may be used to determine the fractal scaling of the pore system, but the analysis is complicated when internal magnetic field gradients at the pore … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Equation 9, the glass bead surface relaxivity 1,Mediumsurface was 10.42 m/sec. The fact that the glass beads had a larger surface relaxivity than the nanoparticles (1.4 m/s) was probably due to the presence of paramagnetic impurities in the glass beads, as has been noted in other studies using these particular beads (e.g., Daigle et al, 2014).…”
Section: -Predicted 1/t 1np From Eqs 2 and 3 Versus Measured 1/t 1supporting
confidence: 52%
“…According to Equation 9, the glass bead surface relaxivity 1,Mediumsurface was 10.42 m/sec. The fact that the glass beads had a larger surface relaxivity than the nanoparticles (1.4 m/s) was probably due to the presence of paramagnetic impurities in the glass beads, as has been noted in other studies using these particular beads (e.g., Daigle et al, 2014).…”
Section: -Predicted 1/t 1np From Eqs 2 and 3 Versus Measured 1/t 1supporting
confidence: 52%
“…After fractal geometry was introduced by Mandelbrot [1983], it became a powerful tool for the analysis of physicogeometrical properties and processes associated with porous media, including surface roughness [Brown, 1987], permeability [Costa, 2006;Xu and Yu, 2008;Xiao et al, 2014], tortuosity [Ghanbarian et al, 2013b], capillary flow [Cai et al, 2012], and pore structure [Ghanbarian-Alavijeh et al, 2011;Daigle et al, 2014]. It has been shown that the irregular nature of porous media exhibits fractal characteristics, and fractal geometry is an effective means for describing porous media [Sahimi, 1993;Yu and Cheng, 2002;Cihan et al, 2009;Cai and Yu, 2011].…”
Section: Pore Fractal Characteristics Of Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that the pore space of a wide variety of media exhibits fractal structure and the surface of the grains or particles that comprise porous systems can themselves be fractal [ Deinert et al ., ]. A general self‐similar set of the pore size distributions is expressed by the box counting method [ Mandelbrot , ; Daigle et al ., ], N()R>rrprefix−D, where r and N ( R > r ) are pore radius and pore numbers with radius larger than r and D is the fractal dimension.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal theory [ Mandelbrot , ] has been developed as a popular tool to investigate pore space of sedimentary rocks and other objects [ Tyler and Wheatcraft , ; Sahouli et al ., ; Hunt and Gee , ; Cai and Yu , ; Ghanbarian et al ., ; Daigle et al ., ; Ge et al ., ]. Compared with classical Euclidean geometry which only works with objects in integer dimension, fractal geometry can be adopted to describe irregular geometrical shapes with nonintegral dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%