2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Changes in Foveal Structure in Individuals with Amblyopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aguirre et al described segmental (superior and nasal) increase in the thickness of central macular [36]. Bruce et al reported a significant increase in macular thickness with reduced foveal pit depth [37]. On the contrary, other studies found no significant evidence of increased macular thickness in patients with amblyopia, and which is in agreement with our results [15-17, 21, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Aguirre et al described segmental (superior and nasal) increase in the thickness of central macular [36]. Bruce et al reported a significant increase in macular thickness with reduced foveal pit depth [37]. On the contrary, other studies found no significant evidence of increased macular thickness in patients with amblyopia, and which is in agreement with our results [15-17, 21, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…0.05). The mean age of patients in the anisometropic group (18 females) was 7.9 AE 2.6 years (4-13); of patients in the strabismic group (17 females), 9.0 AE 3.7 (4-15); and of controls (18 females), 8.4 AE 2.6 (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al[18] found a notable difference between amblyopic and fellow eyes in both the ganglion cell layer and the inner plexiform layer but not in the OS layer. Bruce et al[19] found no difference between amblyopic and fellow eyes but a significant difference between the eyes of amblyopes and controls. These conflicting findings could result from differences in ethnicity, the age of the subjects, severity of amblyopia, or the methods of measuring the thickness of the foveal layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%