2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bike sharing and users’ subjective well-being: An empirical study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An online survey was used to determine how a specific set of cognitive and emotional factors affected a person's decision to switch to a different product brand. For credibility and diversity, this study collected the questionnaire with the assistance of a leading Chinese internet research firm, Sojump.com, a platform that has been used in numerous previous studies [35,36]. The data was collected in August 2017, and all of the participants were required to have had an online shopping experience.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An online survey was used to determine how a specific set of cognitive and emotional factors affected a person's decision to switch to a different product brand. For credibility and diversity, this study collected the questionnaire with the assistance of a leading Chinese internet research firm, Sojump.com, a platform that has been used in numerous previous studies [35,36]. The data was collected in August 2017, and all of the participants were required to have had an online shopping experience.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire method was used to validate the conceptual model ( Table 1). All of the measured items were taken from other published studies: service quality was adapted from Oghuma, et al [43]; system quality was from Chen [44]; perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were taken from Ma, et al [4]; habit was adapted from Xin, et al [2]; customer satisfaction was derived from Zhang, et al [45]; and, finally, the measures of continued usage intention were adapted from Bhattacherjee [20]. The questionnaires gauged responses on a 7-point Likert scale.…”
Section: Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the existing literature on bike sharing, showed that studies mainly focused on factors influencing the choice of bicycle [1,2]; shared bike use behavior [3]; shared bike users' subjective well-being [4]; the diffusion of public bike sharing systems [5]; the influence of bike sharing on other transportation modes such as car use [6]; the impact of weather conditions on bike use [7]; the effects of the built environment on bike sharing demand [8]; bike share rebalancing strategies, patterns, and purposes [9]; bike share safety [10]; bike share demand [11]; impact of pricing and transit disruptions on bike sharing [12]; optimization models for bike-sharing problems with transshipment [13]; bike share stations [14]; bike sharing travel patterns [15]; and, the shared bike users' recommendations [16]. However, few studies have examined what controls the shared bike users' intentions to continued or discontinued usage of shared bikes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars studied the social effects of shared bikes: the membership increase of shared bikes seemed to be slightly due to contagion from neighboring membership [29]. Social influence has a positive effect on users' trust attitude and hence subjective well-being [30]. According to a structural equation model (SEM) of intentions, the significance of factors is a sequence of subjective norms > attitude > perceived pleasure > effects of flexibility and convenience [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%