2003
DOI: 10.1006/cpac.2002.0522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Biggest Scandal in Canadian History": HRDC Audit Starts Probity War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, performance measurement is always ingrained in its own political and ideological basis -some would say bias. For example, regardless of the technocratic claims of the Auditor-General (AG) in Canada, the VFM process remains inherently political (Sutherland, 2003): the AG and the audited public organizations always negotiate the selection of evaluation criteria and benchmarks which serve as the basis of the VFM audit, creating from the start a political, not technical, relationship. A second set of negotiations occurs, and a second political relationship unfolds, once results are known, in an attempt to achieve a common interpretation (though this is not always possible).…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, performance measurement is always ingrained in its own political and ideological basis -some would say bias. For example, regardless of the technocratic claims of the Auditor-General (AG) in Canada, the VFM process remains inherently political (Sutherland, 2003): the AG and the audited public organizations always negotiate the selection of evaluation criteria and benchmarks which serve as the basis of the VFM audit, creating from the start a political, not technical, relationship. A second set of negotiations occurs, and a second political relationship unfolds, once results are known, in an attempt to achieve a common interpretation (though this is not always possible).…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In auditing, the ‘expectations gap’ is the difference between what people in the community (that is, non‐auditors) think audits can do, and the kinds of assurance that audits can actually offer (Humphrey et al 1992; Power 1997). Sutherland (2003) has suggested that an especially wide expectations gap applies to public sector auditing and the work of SAIs. After observing that private sector auditors fear being blamed should they fail to identify corruption or poor performance, and they therefore seek to reduce their exposure by limiting the scope of their assurance, Sutherland (2003: 197‐‐98) argued that the opposite situation arose in the public sector:…”
Section: Seven Critiques Of Performance Auditingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further capacity for change may also be evident in the point made by Eleanor Glor and Ian Greene (2002) that Canada's political culture places a particularly high value on integrity. A post-crisis policy change pattern similar to that in Walkerton was evident in the Human Resources Development Canada crisis (Good 2003;Sutherland 2003;Phillips and Levasseur 2004), 2 suggesting that Canada may exhibit strong reaction to episodes where public officials fail in their duty to ensure public safety and financial probity.…”
Section: The Politics Streammentioning
confidence: 96%