2018
DOI: 10.2308/accr-52106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big N Auditors and Audit Quality: New Evidence from Quasi-Experiments

Abstract: Whether Big N auditors provide higher audit quality than non-Big N auditors remains a debate. We add new evidence to this debate by utilizing the setting of Big N auditors' acquisitions of non-Big N auditors. We identify 331 treatment firms that switched to Big N auditors due to the exogenous shocks imposed by Big N acquisitions. Our difference-in-differences analyses show that treatment firms' audit quality improves after switching to Big N auditors. In comparison, mergers or acquisitions among non-Big Ns hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have attempted to address these concerns using clever settings in which audit firm selection is quasi‐exogenously determined (Che et al ; Jiang et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have attempted to address these concerns using clever settings in which audit firm selection is quasi‐exogenously determined (Che et al ; Jiang et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to John (Xuefeng) Jiang and al (2019) the companies audit quality improves after the transition to the audit big 4, the mergers and acquisitions done between non big 4 does not have an impact on the quality of audit. In addition, their analysis shows that the improvement of audit quality is due to the general competence of big 4 auditors more than to their specific expertise in the sector.…”
Section: The Competence and Independence Of The Auditormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike our within-audit-firm comparison, both of these studies compare the audit performance or audit effort across different audit firms. Another related study, Jiang, Wang and Wang (2018), uses the setting of Big N auditors' acquisitions of non-Big N auditors in the United States, and compares the audit quality of client companies audited by Big-N auditors (due to the acquisition) with that of client companies audited by non-Big N auditors. In contrast, our comparison is between treated and control clients in the same audit firm, and our evidence suggests that removing organizational boundaries facilitates knowledge transfer.…”
Section: 1related Literature and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%