Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Articles in the First 50 Years of Heart Transplantation

Kolkailah, Ahmed A.; Fugar, Setri; Vondee, Noble; Hirji, Sameer; Okoh, Alexis K.; Ayoub, Ali; Al‐Ogaili, Ahmed; Rios, Luis H Paz; Kumar, Siva; Camacho, M.; Rich, Jonathan D.; Golzar, Yasmeen

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.010

Cited by 29 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The AAS of articles about oral cancer was not significantly correlated with the impact factor or the quartile of the publishing journal; this is in agreement with similar studies about online attention to research in different disciplines including dentistry, nursing, and radiology (Dardas et al, ; Delli et al, ; Rosenkrantz, Ayoola, Singh, & Duszak, ). On the contrary, the majority of studies about conventional metrics report that highly cited articles are typically published in Q1 journals and in journals with high impact factor (Feijoo, Limeres, Fernández‐Varela, Ramos, & Diz, ; Kolkailah et al, ; Shuaib & Costa, ). These findings suggest that there is a need to study differences in the perceived significance of research between the scholarly community and the public.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The online attention to oral cancer research: An Altmetric analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Altmetrics, or alternative metrics, have recently emerged as a web‐based metrics measuring the impact of research with an emphasis on the public engagement with the research output. In this study, we aimed to identify and analyze research articles about oral cancer that provoked the most online attention. Methods Altmetric Explorer was used to identify articles about oral cancer that generated the highest online attention. Descriptive and correlational statistics were performed, and the top 100 articles were identified and analyzed. Results A total of 7,940 articles were identified. Topics were mostly discussed on Facebook, Twitter, Mendeley, and news outlets. The top 100 articles that generated the highest online attention discussed mainly topics related to treatment outcomes and quality of life. Human papilloma virus (HPV) was the most commonly discussed individual topic in the list of top 100 outputs (n = 20). Most articles originated from the USA (n = 46) and Europe (n = 33; mainly from UK [24 articles]). Articles were published in 47 journals that belong to different specialities; journals with a social media account had significantly higher Altmetric scores for their articles compared to those without an account. Conclusion Topics of general interest to the public such as HPV transmission and vaccination, risk factors, and treatment generated the highest online attention.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The online attention to oral cancer research: An Altmetric analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The achievement on vaccine was reflected by scientific studies, 12 particularly in the most cited studies. 13,14 Citation analysis is a type of bibliometric analysis in which evaluation and ranking of an article are done on the basis citation count. 15 Identification the milestones in a specific field can be done by analyzing the most cited study, especially by analyzing the 100 top-cited studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…15 Identification the milestones in a specific field can be done by analyzing the most cited study, especially by analyzing the 100 top-cited studies. 13,14,16,17 Assessment of the 100 top-cited studies had been conducted for various diseases including tuberculosis, 18 diabetes, 14 emergency medicine, 19 etc. However, there is no such study on the vaccine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 100 top-cited studies on vaccine: a bibliometric analysis

Zhang

Quan

Xiao

et al. 2019

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the 100 most cited studies on vaccine. Methods: A comprehensive search of studies on vaccine was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection without year or language restrictions. The 100 top-cited studies were retrieved after screening abstracts or full-texts. The outcomes of bibliometric analysis included citation time, citation density, journal name, impact factor, publication year, article type, category, open access, and country of origin. Results: The citation times for the 100 top-cited studies ranged from 593 to 2406, with a median citation times of 834. The 100 top-cited studies were published in 32 journals, and the journal with the most studies was New England Journal of Medicine (n = 20). They were published between 1969 and 2012, and 4 authors published at least 2 studies as the first author. The USA contributed the most studies (n = 70), followed by Switzerland (n = 4), England (n = 4) and Finland (n = 4). Eighty-one studies were published as Article, while 19 were Review. Eleven studies were about vaccine for therapeutic and 68 studies were about vaccine for prophylactic. Conclusions: This is the first bibliometric analysis to provide a detailed list of the 100 most-cited studies on vaccine and helps to recognize the quality of the works, discoveries, and trends in the field.

show abstract

“…Using bibliometric analysis to measure and rank research output has been applied to a wide spectrum of specialties in respiratory medicine, cancer, urology, and transplantation. [5][6][7][8][9] The aim of this study is to quantitatively analyze the research progress and growing trend in labor analgesia during 1988-2018 and make clear the China's contribution to labor analgesia management by utilizing the bibliometrics analysis to evaluate the quantity and quality of researches. Our study also intends to highlight the most prolific areas of research in this field.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>The Trend of Labor Analgesia in the World and China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in Recent 30 Years</p>

Zheng

Lin

2020

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Labor analgesia is part of the most important tasks an anesthesiologist needs to deal with. With the "two-child policy" in China, the number of parturients has increased significantly, labor analgesia more should be valued. There has been a tremendous change on labor analgesia research in China and around the world; however, broader trends in the prevalence and scope of labor analgesia research remain underexplored. The current study quantitatively analyzes trends in labor analgesia research publications in the past 30 years. Methods: A bibliometric approach was used to search Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure for all labor analgesia-related research articles. The research progress and growing trend were quantitatively analyzed by total publications, research types, research institutions, journal impact factors, and author's contribution. Total citations frequency, average citations per item and h-index were used for evaluating literature quantity. Results: From 1988 to 2018, over 8000 documents in labor analgesia research field were published worldwide. According to Scopus, 68.2% papers of all documents were articles. The USA published the largest number of articles (2204, 27.45%). China had published 175 articles (2.18%), ranking the 11th. According to WOS, there were 221 research categories for labor analgesia articles all over the world. The total citations were 76,207, average 9.086 citations per item, and the h-index was 114, average 14 citations per item worldwide. The total citations and h-index of papers published in China were as follows: 353 total citations, 7.06 citations per item, and 10 h-index. High contribution journals, authors, institutions and the top 10 most cited articles on labor analgesia in the world and China were also listed. Conclusion: Labor analgesia research has grown markedly during the 1988-2018 period. Although China had made remarkable achievements, there was a gap in the high-quality studies between China and other leading countries.

show abstract

Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Articles in the First 50 Years of Heart Transplantation

Cited by 29 publications

References 23 publications

The online attention to oral cancer research: An Altmetric analysis

The online attention to oral cancer research: An Altmetric analysis

The 100 top-cited studies on vaccine: a bibliometric analysis

<p>The Trend of Labor Analgesia in the World and China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in Recent 30 Years</p>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About