2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias dependence of TID radiation responses of 0.13μm partially depleted SOI NMOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the 0V-F bias has similar shift value with the ON-F case, which demonstrates that the charge trapping in BOX is not influenced by the gate bias during irradiation [10,12]. As expected, the PG bias condition, the worst irradiation bias for back channel [10,12,17], introduces much larger negative threshold voltage shift than that of ON bias. However, different from the ON case group, there is no significant difference between the PG bias and PG-F bias.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the 0V-F bias has similar shift value with the ON-F case, which demonstrates that the charge trapping in BOX is not influenced by the gate bias during irradiation [10,12]. As expected, the PG bias condition, the worst irradiation bias for back channel [10,12,17], introduces much larger negative threshold voltage shift than that of ON bias. However, different from the ON case group, there is no significant difference between the PG bias and PG-F bias.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the thick buried oxide (BOX) layer threatens the reliability of SOI devices during ionizing radiation, in which the positive trapped charges will build up in the BOX after total ionizing dose, reducing the threshold voltage of back-gate transistor and increasing leakage current [6,7,8,9]. The radiation response of buried oxides has been found to be highly dependent on the device bias configuration during radiation, which determines the electrical field distribution in BOX [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitance-voltage (CV) method has difficulty in measuring accurately interface trap density in deep submicron transistors. The characterization of back interface properties in SOI transistors remains a challenge [13], [14]. The direct-current current-voltage (DCIV) technique proposed by Sah and Jie in 1995 [15] has been employed for the measurement of back-channel interface traps in SOI devices [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b) [24], [25]. However, further examination shows that the high body doping used in this device makes it immune to the formation of a leakage path up to very high total doses, and furthermore, that there exists a threshold above which no further charges are being trapped due to an equivalent positive charge density aggregating at the bottom of the BOX [17].…”
Section: Silicon-on-insulator and Shallow Trench Isolationmentioning
confidence: 98%