2018
DOI: 10.5194/esd-9-627-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias correction of surface downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation for the EWEMBI dataset

Abstract: Abstract. Many meteorological forcing datasets include bias-corrected surface downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation (rlds and rsds). Methods used for such bias corrections range from multi-year monthly mean value scaling to quantile mapping at the daily timescale. An additional downscaling is necessary if the data to be corrected have a higher spatial resolution than the observational data used to determine the biases. This was the case when EartH2Observe (E2OBS; Calton et al., 2016) rlds and rsds were … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for using this approach were twofold: first, the bias-corrected data for the HadGem2-ES were produced within the ISI-MIP project (Hempel et al, 2013;Warszawski et al, 2014) but at daily time steps only, while the ED2 land surface model requires more detailed time scale inputs (we used the three hourly original data made available by the U.K. Meteorological Office, later downscaled at hourly time steps). Methodologies for the calculation of bias corrected surface downward longwave and shortwave radiation data were made available only recently (as reviewed in Lange, 2018). Methodologies for the calculation of bias corrected surface downward longwave and shortwave radiation data were made available only recently (as reviewed in Lange, 2018).…”
Section: Bias Correction Of Simulated Streamflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for using this approach were twofold: first, the bias-corrected data for the HadGem2-ES were produced within the ISI-MIP project (Hempel et al, 2013;Warszawski et al, 2014) but at daily time steps only, while the ED2 land surface model requires more detailed time scale inputs (we used the three hourly original data made available by the U.K. Meteorological Office, later downscaled at hourly time steps). Methodologies for the calculation of bias corrected surface downward longwave and shortwave radiation data were made available only recently (as reviewed in Lange, 2018). Methodologies for the calculation of bias corrected surface downward longwave and shortwave radiation data were made available only recently (as reviewed in Lange, 2018).…”
Section: Bias Correction Of Simulated Streamflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, statistical bias correction of meteorological data is typically applied only to temperature and precipitation, thereby creating physical inconsistencies with the other variables needed for the land surface model forcing (longwave and shortwave radiation, humidity, pressure, and wind, as described in Table 1). Methodologies for the calculation of bias corrected surface downward longwave and shortwave radiation data were made available only recently (as reviewed in Lange, 2018).…”
Section: Bias Correction Of Simulated Streamflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial dataset includes downscaled daily climate projections on a horizontal grid with 0.5°× 0.5°resolution from four GCMs (i.e. GFDL-ESM2M, HadGEM2-ES, IPSL-CM5A-LR, and MIROC5) corrected for bias based on the EartH2 Observe, WFDEI and ERA-Interim data Merged and Bias-corrected for ISIMIP (EWEMBI) dataset [31,32]. We obtained location-specific daily temperature series for future period under all the four GCMs for each of the four climate change scenarios, i.e.…”
Section: Temperature Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CWatM is able to use different dataset of meteorological forcing for current climate, for example, MSWEP (Beck et al, 2017), WFDEI (Weedon et al, 2014), PGMFD (Sheffield et al, 2006), GSWP3 or EWEMBI (Lange, 2018) or future climate projections from different General Circulation Models (GCMs), ) (e.g., data from ISIMIP project (Frieler et al, 2016). CWatM can use the netCDF4 repositories of original meteorological forcing without reformatting.…”
Section: Meteorological Forcing 185mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can also be applied at 30 arc sec. CWatM follows a modeling concept similar to that of large-scale hydrological models such as H08 (Hanasaki et al, 2006;2018), WaterGAP (Alcamo et al, 2003;Flörke et al, 2013), LPJmL (Bondeau et al, 2007;Rost et al, 2008), LISFLOOD (De Roo et al, 2000;Burek et al, 2013;De Roo et al, 2000), PCR-GLOBWB (Van Beek et al, 2011;Wada et al, 2014;Sutanudjaja et al, 2018), VIC (Xu et al, 1994), MHM (Samaniego et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2013), and HBV (Bergström and Forsman, 110 1973;Lindström, 1997). A comprehensive overview of existing GHMs is given in Bierkens (2015), Kauffeldt et al (2016), Pokhrel et al (2016), Wada et al (2017), and in the ISI-MIP project (Frieler et al, 2016) , the latter having been used for https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-214 Preprint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%