2001
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Obvious: Chronic Vividness of Imagery and the Use of Information in Decision Making

Abstract: The authors investigate two competing hypotheses about how chronic vividness of imagery interacts with the vividness and salience of information in decision making. Results from four studies, covering a variety of decision domains, indicate that chronic imagery vividness rarely amplifies the effects of vivid and salient information. Imagery vividness may, in fact, attenuate the effects of vivid and salient information. This is because, relative to nonvivid imagers, vivid imagers rely less on information that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imagery can actually attenuate the effect of such information because people who are good imagers tend to ignore information that is obvious and look for information that is non-obvious. Thus, imagery is likely to amplify the effects of vivid information only when this is the sole information available to individuals (Pham, Meyvis, & Zhou, 2001).…”
Section: Imagery Elicited By Picturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imagery can actually attenuate the effect of such information because people who are good imagers tend to ignore information that is obvious and look for information that is non-obvious. Thus, imagery is likely to amplify the effects of vivid information only when this is the sole information available to individuals (Pham, Meyvis, & Zhou, 2001).…”
Section: Imagery Elicited By Picturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental imagery supports several aspects of healthy as well as pathological cognition and has received considerable interest in cognitive psychology research. Different kinds of imagery relate to a range of processes such as memory recall and future thinking (Moulton & Kosslyn, 2009;Schacter et al, 2007), decision-making (Pham et al, 2001), navigation (Bocchi et al, 2017), and mental training (Clark et al, 2012), but also pathological symptomatology (e.g., obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Pearson (2007) describes mental imagery as the simulation or re-creation of perceptual experience in the absence of a corresponding direct external stimulus from the physical environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further showed that the magnitude of this mental capacity moderates the degree to which consumers erroneously associate concepts of brand softness (vs. hardness) to logo circularity (vs. angularity). Research suggests that people systematically vary by the magnitude of these two resources, and thus their tendency to process phonological versus visuospatial information (Childers et al, 1985; Jiang & Wyer, 2009; Pham et al, 2001; Wyer et al, 2008), classifies individuals to verbalizers versus visualizers (Childers et al, 1985; Jiang et al, 2016). These cognitive resources are depletable.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%