Global usage of the Internet has increased remarkably in the past few decades, thus necessitating a better understanding of e-commerce adoption across cultures. Against this backdrop, this study contributes to the existing technology adoption and acceptance literature in the following ways. First, the authors develop an extended technology acceptance model that incorporates trust and perceived behavioral control and examine it in settings outside the United States to better understand the adoption of e-commerce across cultures. Contrary to the authors' expectations, the predictive power of the technology acceptance model seems robust and holds true for both Pakistan and Canada, despite some noteworthy differences between the two cultures. Second, although the importance of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on consumers' intentions to shop online was validated across both cultures, the results highlight the complex relationships between perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to adopt in each country. The authors offer suggestions to technology managers and e-retailers regarding navigating through new technology and ecommerce adoption under various cultural contexts.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to PALAIOS.
Although mobile commerce growth shows a promising trend and provides ample potential for retailers around the globe, several studies have shown that m-commerce has failed so far in attracting the hearts and minds of potential customers across different countries. Unlike past studies that examine single countries and/or developed markets, this study advances the literature by comparing m-commerce customers' behavioral intentions and actual behaviors using data from 812 m-commerce users across four countries (Australia, India, U.S., and Pakistan). This four-country context offers a unique opportunity for understanding how m-commerce consumers' behaviors differ across disparate national markets. We propose a conceptual framework linking m-commerce users' behaviors (intentions and actual usages) to its key drivers including ubiquity and habit, and develop hypothesis about the moderating roles of m-commerce readiness and habit in these linkages. The results reveal important asymmetries between m-commerce readiness stage and between habit: users at early m-commerce readiness stage assign more importance to ubiquity relative to habit in influencing purchase intentions, whereas the opposite is true for the users who are at an advanced m-commerce readiness stage. Habit moderates the influence of ubiquity such that its importance in determining intention decreases as the behavior in question takes a more habitual nature. We outline how m-retailers operating across different countriesdeveloped and developing-should adapt their marketing strategies to customers at different mcommerce readiness stages.
Significant time, resources, and attention have been given over the past few decades to explore how businesses can attract more customers to their online stores, and yet problems remain. It is still difficult to convert a potential customer's initial online encounter into a buying relationship.Thus, this study aims to develop a deeper comprehension of the driving forces that not only attract visitors to a website, but also motivate them to make a purchase. Drawing from the ecommerce, regulatory focus, and regulatory fit theory literatures, this study crafts a series of predictions about visitors' attraction to and intention to purchase from a website. In studies conducted using three different technology-product websites (i.e., websites selling smartphones, smartwatches, and laptops) and two different samples (i.e., students and actual shoppers), we found supporting evidence that visitors' evaluation and purchase intentions are determined by the fit between the shopping experiences offered (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and visitors' regulatory focus (promotion vs. prevention). Furthermore, we reveal that engagement, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use serve as the underlying mechanisms that mediate the effect of regulatory fit on visitors' attitudes and purchase intentions.
Despite promising growth, mobile commerce (m-commerce) still represents only a small proportion of the world's total e-commerce market. The research behind this article moves away from the predominantly single-country (typically developed) and utilitarian-focused market scope of past research to examine and provide a more nuanced understanding of customers’ motivations, whether utilitarian or hedonic, for using m-commerce across six countries. The six-country context, with data collected from 1,183 m-commerce users, offers a unique opportunity to advance mobile-retailing literature by comparing customers’ value perceptions, trust, and m-commerce use across disparate national markets. By treating motivations as conditions activated by individuals’ chronic regulatory orientations, our results show that hedonic motivation plays a more significant role in influencing customers’ value perceptions and trust for those who are promotion oriented (Australia and the United States), whereas utilitarian motivation plays a more important role for those who are prevention oriented (Bangladesh and Vietnam). Finally, both hedonic and utilitarian motivations play an important role in influencing customers’ value perceptions and trust for those who are moderately promotion and prevention oriented (India and Pakistan). These results offer insights to mobile retailers operating internationally in their decisions to standardize or adapt the mobile-shopping environment to deliver the most valuable, trustworthy, and engaging solutions to customers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.