Best practices in collecting online data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White respondents: evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey

Barreto, Matt A.; Frasure-Yokley, Lorrie; Vargas, Edward D.; Wong, Janelle

doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1419433

Cited by 78 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the total 10,145 respondents, 3,006 identify as Asian American or Pacific Islander (AAPI). The demographic characteristics of the AAPI sample are consistent with those of the 2016 National Asian American Survey and the 2012 PEW Asian American Survey (Barreto et al 2018).…”

Section: Methodssupporting

confidence: 69%

The Ties that Bind: Assessing the Effects of Political and Racial Church Homogeneity on Asian American Political Participation

Chan

Phoenix

2020

Politics and Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research consistently emphasizes the importance of religious institutions for influencing political action among Asian Americans. The social capital literature offers two theoretical explanations for why churches increase political activity: bridging capital between different groups and bonding capital among similar groups. The latter argues that individuals who attend racially homogeneous churches are more participatory. This paper expands on these accounts by examining another aspect of bonding. That is, how does similarity in political views among church members affect Asian Americans' political participation? Results from the 2016 Collaborative Multi-Racial Post-Election Survey show that Asian Americans who attend politically homogeneous churches are more likely to vote and participate in conventional activities. The effects of racial homogeneity are limited once taking political homogeneity into consideration. These findings provide evidence that political homophily within religious organizations may facilitate the bonding of social capital between racial/ethnic minorities, and this homophily is indeed salient to democratic participation.

show abstract

Section: Methodssupporting

confidence: 69%

The Ties that Bind: Assessing the Effects of Political and Racial Church Homogeneity on Asian American Political Participation

Chan

Phoenix

2020

Politics and Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This paper is based upon analysis of the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (Barreto 2017; Barreto et al 2017; Barreto et al 2018). The 2016 CMPS includes more than 10,000 respondents, including (self-identified) 1,032 “Whites”; 3,102 “Black/African Americans”; 3,003 Latinx (“Latino/a”/“Hispanic”) and 3,006 “Asian”/“Asian Americans.” The survey was conducted via a “random to web” method such that emails were selected randomly from a registered voter and commercial vending lists and individuals associated with those emails were contacted and invited to participate in an online survey.…”

Section: Rising Evangelical Power Rising Numbers Of Immigrantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A post-stratification raking algorithm was used to balance each category within ±1% of the ACS estimates. Barreto et al (2018) provide a comparison and more in-depth description of the strengths and limitations of the CMPS compared with other surveys.…”

Section: Rising Evangelical Power Rising Numbers Of Immigrantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evangelical Vote and Race in the 2016 Presidential Election

Wong

2018

J. Race Ethnicity Politics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper highlights differences in evangelical identity and its association with political attitudes across racial groups. It finds that White evangelicals hold more conservative views than Black, Latinx, and Asian American evangelicals, despite similar levels of religiosity. White evangelicals' more conservative political attitudes are driven by a sense of in-group embattlement, or the idea that their group faces as much or more discrimination as persecuted outgroups. This sense of in-group embattlement is distinct from the effects of economic resources, economic anxiety, partisanship, region (South) and generalized conservative outlook. The paper draws on survey data collected in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election.

show abstract

“…To measure black anti-Latino attitudes and anti-immigrant attitudes, we turn to the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS). The extensive CMPS questionnaire and the large black sample size enable us to conduct a robust evaluation of the sociodemographic and attitudinal variables determining black support for restrictive immigration policy [84]. The 2016 CMPS was an online self-administered multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, post-election survey of 10,145 adult Americans fielded from 3 December, 2016 to 15 February, 2017.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptual Knots and Black Identity Politics: Linked Fate, American Heritage, and Support for Trump Era Immigration Policy

Carter

King-Meadows

2019

Societies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, much ado has been made about how racial anxiety fueled White vote choice for Donald Trump. Far less empirical attention has been paid to whether the 2016 election cycle triggered black anxieties and if those anxieties led blacks to reevaluate their communities' standing relative to Latinos and immigrants. Employing data from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey, we examine the extent to which race consciousness both coexists with black perceptions of Latinos and shapes black support for anti-immigrant legislation. Our results address how the conflation of Latino with undocumented immigrant may have activated a perceptional and policy backlash amongst black voters.

show abstract

Best practices in collecting online data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White respondents: evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey

Cited by 78 publications

References 10 publications

The Ties that Bind: Assessing the Effects of Political and Racial Church Homogeneity on Asian American Political Participation

The Ties that Bind: Assessing the Effects of Political and Racial Church Homogeneity on Asian American Political Participation

The Evangelical Vote and Race in the 2016 Presidential Election

Perceptual Knots and Black Identity Politics: Linked Fate, American Heritage, and Support for Trump Era Immigration Policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About