2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2212478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking time-of-flight based depth measurement techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is usually paired with a high sensitivity receiver therefore gains significant momentum as Si CMOS based single-photon avalanche detector (SPAD) matures in recent years. The light pulse travel time can be calculated by a time-correlated Geier mode detection method [7] or by a coincidence detection method which better tackles a premature sampling issue [8].…”
Section: Distance Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually paired with a high sensitivity receiver therefore gains significant momentum as Si CMOS based single-photon avalanche detector (SPAD) matures in recent years. The light pulse travel time can be calculated by a time-correlated Geier mode detection method [7] or by a coincidence detection method which better tackles a premature sampling issue [8].…”
Section: Distance Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of realizing the specifications of obstacle recognition and FoV surveillance in automotive applications, typically, scanner systems are the preferred technology in the market. 5,6 Concerning transmission power consumption, the trade-off between meaningful measurement distances (<100 m) 6,7 and horizontal FoV dimensions (>AE20 deg) 8 is obligatory for flash LiDAR systems. The power consumption exceeds by factors compared to that of scanner systems, which is why the common operating range of flash systems is around 0.1 to 25 m. 3,7 The state-of-the-art laser scanner systems in automotive applications are based on transmission signal deflection modules with large, heavy and expensive oscillating or rotating mirrors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of angular resolution is around 0.01 deg to 0.5 deg with an angular uncertainty up to 0.015 deg. [5][6][7][8][9] However, the large construction size, the fine mechanics setup, as well as low potential of automated high volume manufacturing seem to be the major drawbacks of this kind of scanner design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIDAR operates by emitting a laser pulse and the time-of-flight (ToF) need to travel from the transmitter to a target object and back [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The main drawback of pulsed scanning LIDAR is that its maximum measurable range is proportional to the maximum pulse repetition period, and high-angular-resolution scanning is only possible at low revolutions per second.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%