Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2016.1162146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief into Action Scale: psychometric properties of the Farsi version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The European Portuguese version of the BIAC was found to have solid internal reliability (α = .86), above of the recommended value of .70 (Taber, 2018). In comparison with the original study, the internal reliability was found to be similar (α = .89) (Koenig et al 2015a), as well as that found in Farsi and Chinese versions of the BIAC (Hafizi, Tabatabaei, Memari, Saghazadeh, & Koenig, 2016; Wang, Ma, Rong, & Koenig, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The European Portuguese version of the BIAC was found to have solid internal reliability (α = .86), above of the recommended value of .70 (Taber, 2018). In comparison with the original study, the internal reliability was found to be similar (α = .89) (Koenig et al 2015a), as well as that found in Farsi and Chinese versions of the BIAC (Hafizi, Tabatabaei, Memari, Saghazadeh, & Koenig, 2016; Wang, Ma, Rong, & Koenig, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Previous studies that have examined PCA with an oblique rotation have also reported the emergence of two factors that were highly correlated supporting the results here. For example, Hafizi et al (2016) found a two-factor solution for the Farsi version of the BIAC that explained 58.0% of the variance, and again, the two factors were highly correlated ( r = 0.537). This is comparable to our findings of a two-factor solution explaining 60.8% of the variance, with a correlation between the two factors of r = 0.582.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, BIAC scale was developed and has been incorporated in the studies within different contexts. It is proved to provide valid measures for people's religiosity in diverse religious groups (Hafizi et al, 2016;Koenig et al, 2015;Martins et al, 2020). The basis for content in the BIAC scale is the importance of religion in a person's life, such as how they spend their time, talents, and financial resources related to their religious belief (Koenig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Perceived Religiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hafizi, Tabatabaei, Memari, Saghazadeh, and Koenig (2016) report among a sample of 200 Muslim volunteers in Iran, the satisfactory psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Belief into Action Scale. Singh, Junnarkar, Snehlata, and Kaur (2016) report among a sample of 826 Hindu speaking Indian adults, the satisfactory psychometric properties of the Hindi version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%