Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

Robinson, Michael D.; Clore, Gerald L.

doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934

Cited by 1,500 publications

(1,512 citation statements)

References 212 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,404

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…People's representations of past events may be partly or wholly comprised of current knowledge, attitudes, and experiences (e.g., Bartlett, 1932;Loftus & Palmer, 1974;Schacter, 2001). Similarly, as memory for past feelings becomes inaccessible over time, people rely on salient information to reconstruct how they must have felt (Robinson & Clore, 2002a, 2002bRoss, 1989;Levine, 1997). We proposed that the magnitude and direction of bias in reports of the intensity of past feelings depends on whether people are remembering emotion (feelings about a specific event) or mood (feelings that are not about a specific event).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood.

Kaplan¹,

Levine²,

Lench³

et al. 2016

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer reviewed eScholarship.orgPowered by the California Digital Library University of California Adding Comments and Notes to Your PDFTo facilitate electronic transmittal of corrections, we encourage authors to utilize the comment/annotations features in Adobe Acrobat. The PDF provided has been comment enabled, which allows you to utilize the comment and annotation features even if using only the free Adobe Acrobat reader (see note below regarding acceptable versions). Adobe Acrobat's Help menu provides additional details on the tools. When you open your PDF, the annotation tools are clearly shown on the tool bar (although icons may differ slightly among versions from what is shown below).For purposes of correcting the PDF proof of your journal article, the important features to know are the following:To insert text, place your cursor at a point in text and select the Insert Text tool ( ) from the menu bar. Type your additional text in the pop-up box.To replace text, highlight the text to be changed, select the Replace Text tool ( ) from the menu bar, and type the new text in the pop-up box. Do this instead of deleting and then reinserting.To delete text, highlight the text to be deleted and press the Delete button on the keyboard.Use the Sticky Note tool ( ) to describe changes that need to be made (e.g., changes in bold, italics, or capitalization use; altering or replacing a figure) or to answer a question or approve a change from the editor. To use this feature, click on the Sticky Note tool in the menu bar and then click on a point in the PDF where you would like to make a comment. Then type your comment in the pop-up box.Use the Callout tool ( ) to point directly to changes that need to be made. Try to put the callout box in an area of white space so that you do not obscure the text.Use the Highlight and Add Note to Text tool ( ) to indicate font problems, bad breaks, and other textual inconsistencies. Select text to be changed, choose this tool, and type your comment in the pop-up box. One note can describe many changes.To view a list of changes to the proof or to see a more comprehensive set of annotation tools, select Comment from the menu bar. ) ) ) ) ) As with hand-annotated proof corrections, the important points are to communicate changes clearly and thoroughly, to answer all queries and questions, and to provide complete information to allow us to make the necessary changes to your article so it is ready for publication. Do not use tools that incorporate changes to the text in such a way that no indication of a change is visible. Such changes will not be incorporated into the final proof.To utilize the comments features on this PDF you will need Adobe Reader version 7 or higher. This program is freely available and can be downloaded from http://get.adobe.com/reader/ 1 REPRINTS Authors have two options for ordering reprints:Authors who need to use purchase orders may order reprints from the standard Purchase Order Service. For a substantially lower price, authors may use the Prepaid Service. The rat...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood.

Kaplan¹,

Levine²,

Lench³

et al. 2016

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Situation-specific measures of positive and negative emotions are needed to study co-ocurrences in this more narrow meaning -different emotions experienced at the same time. It has been argued that asking participants in retrospective questions to mentally aggregate their experiences over time may lead to memory biases and self-belief biases, and therefore be less valid than in-the-moment measures of emotions (see e.g., Goetz et al, 2013;Robinson & Clore, 2002;Takarangi et al, 2006). To address this limitation of the present study, Study 2 used in-the-moment measures of emotions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed Emotions: Network Analyses of Intra-Individual Co-occurrences Within and Across Situations

Moeller¹,

Ivčević²,

Brackett³

et al. 2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study revisits the structure of emotions by employing a co-occurrence network analysis. While previous studies have examined the structure of emotions primarily through inter-individual correlations, we investigated how often and which specific positive and negative emotions occur together within individuals. Two studies were conducted with high school students, one (N=21,678) using retrospective emotion measures (open-ended questions and 28 rated items) and the other (N = 471) using in-the-moment emotion measures (experience sampling).As in previous studies, positive and negative emotion ratings were negatively correlated across individuals, and this negative correlation became stronger when

show abstract

“…Self-reported retrospective experiences may be biased and, therefore, may reduce validity (Schwarz 2007), because older people may have difficulties in recalling events, behaviors, and feelings they experienced months ago. Subjective experiences, including the intensity of feelings, are poorly represented in memory: Once the experience ends, its characteristics can no longer be directly examined (Robinson and Clore 2002) and, therefore, respondents need to again rely on fragmentary recall. It can be concluded that if the study had been conducted in real time or immediately after the military operation the responses might have been somewhat different and more valid.…”

Section: Research Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sense of threat and coping strategies of Israeli older adults during a military operation

Rozenblat

Iecovich

2012

Eur J Ageing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To examine what levels of sense of threat functionally disabled older people experience during war and the coping strategies they use to protect themselves; to examine factors that explain their sense of threat and coping strategies. A convenience sample that included 138 respondents who were functionally disabled older adults and received homecare services. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using a structured questionnaire. The majority of respondents stayed in their homes during the military operation and used a shelter during part or all the times when there was rocket shelling. The findings showed that a variety of factors were significantly correlated with sense of threat and coping strategies; gender and education were significant in explaining sense of threat, and living arrangement was significant in explaining use of shelter; while number of children was significant in explaining frequency of staying at home during the military operation. However, Holocaust survivor status, formal and informal support, and functional status were insignificant in explaining any of the dependent variables. Holocaust survivors feel no more threat compared to those who did not experience the Holocaust. Communities should be prepared to provide emergency services to ease the sense of threat of functionally disabled older adults during wartime and to assure their use of shelter, in particular those who live alone.

show abstract

Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

Cited by 1,500 publications

References 212 publications

Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood.

Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood.

Mixed Emotions: Network Analyses of Intra-Individual Co-occurrences Within and Across Situations

Sense of threat and coping strategies of Israeli older adults during a military operation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About