2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural responses of two-spotted spider mites induced by predator-borne and prey-borne cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach is a widely used method for evaluation of mite behavior in experimental arenas (e.g. Guyris et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2018). Other results may have been obtained using intact plants, thus further studies using P. persimilis on fungal inoculated and uninoculated plants are needed to evaluate effects at spider mite population level and on predator fitness to conclude on compatibility between seed inoculation of entomopathogenic fungi and release of P. persimilis for combined spider mite control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is a widely used method for evaluation of mite behavior in experimental arenas (e.g. Guyris et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2018). Other results may have been obtained using intact plants, thus further studies using P. persimilis on fungal inoculated and uninoculated plants are needed to evaluate effects at spider mite population level and on predator fitness to conclude on compatibility between seed inoculation of entomopathogenic fungi and release of P. persimilis for combined spider mite control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Buchanan et al 19 suggested that the risk cues affect both behavioral and physiological traits in prey but have stronger impacts on behavioral traits. For example, spider mites tend to stay away from the areas with predator cues, 20,21 aggregate more tightly in such areas, 22 change locomotion activity, 9 or shift their oviposition site from leaf surface to their webs. 23,24 Predation risk incurs trade-offs between risk avoidance and other life functions in prey, 25,26 altering their life-history traits, 13,16,23,[27][28][29][30][31][32] and reducing their fitness and population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Plant-feeding mites can detect predation risk through chemical cues from predators and killed conspecifics, and respond accordingly. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Buchanan et al 19 suggested that the risk cues affect both behavioral and physiological traits in prey but have stronger impacts on behavioral traits. For example, spider mites tend to stay away from the areas with predator cues, 20,21 aggregate more tightly in such areas, 22 change locomotion activity, 9 or shift their oviposition site from leaf surface to their webs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These aggregation indices provide primary information for developing sampling programs geared at estimating population density. For T. evansi, among the drivers for group-formation and living (aggregation) is the aspect of strengthened anti-predator functions [24,25]. According to Dittmann and Schausberger (2017), anti-predator benefits of aggregation could arise from phenomena such as the dilution effect, encounter or avoidance effect, increased vigilance, cooperative defense, and predator confusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%