1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(85)80052-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral conditioning and experimental motion-induced sickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The males were more sensitive than the females (latency, 10.50 vs. 24.13 min) with significant individual differences. Regional differences were observed: 59% in Bolivian, 29% in Colombian, but with no significant difference in latency [123,137]. Habituation was observed when the horizontal rotation was repeated [138] A combination of rotatory stimulation with visual stimulation enhanced the incidence of motion sickness (53%, 48.1 min vs. 76%, 17.2 min).…”
Section: Motion Sickness or Space Motion Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The males were more sensitive than the females (latency, 10.50 vs. 24.13 min) with significant individual differences. Regional differences were observed: 59% in Bolivian, 29% in Colombian, but with no significant difference in latency [123,137]. Habituation was observed when the horizontal rotation was repeated [138] A combination of rotatory stimulation with visual stimulation enhanced the incidence of motion sickness (53%, 48.1 min vs. 76%, 17.2 min).…”
Section: Motion Sickness or Space Motion Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habituation was observed when the horizontal rotation was repeated [138] A combination of rotatory stimulation with visual stimulation enhanced the incidence of motion sickness (53%, 48.1 min vs. 76%, 17.2 min). The incidence was higher when the head and body were free to move than when they were restrained [123,137,139]. With a combination of rotation with visual stimulation, the vertical rotation was more effective than the horizontal rotation [140][141][142][143][144][145]; rating scores were 16.4Ϯ1.8 vs. 8.3Ϯ1.77 (cf.…”
Section: Motion Sickness or Space Motion Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation