Beam tests of ATLAS SCT silicon strip detector modules

Campabadal, F.; Fleta, C.; Key, M.; Lozano, M.; Martínez, C. Moreno; Pellegrini, G.; Rafi, JM; Ullán, M.; Johansen, L. G.; Pommeresche, B.; Stugu, B.; Ciocio, A.; Fadeyev, V.; Gilchriese, M.; Haber, C.; Siegrist, J.; Spieler, H.; Vu, C.; Bell, P. J.; Charlton, D. G.; Dowell, J. D.; Gallop, B. J.; Homer, R. J.; Jovanović, P.; Mahout, G.; McMahon, Thomas J.; Wilson, J. A.; Barr, A. J.; Carter, J.R.; Fromant, B.P.; Goodrick, M. J.; Hill, J. C.; Lester, C. G.; Palmer, M.; Parker, M. A.; Robinson, D.; Sabetfakhri, A.; Shaw, R. J.; Anghinolfi, F.; Chesi, E.; Chouridou, S.; Fortin, R; Große-Knetter, J.; Gruwé, M.; Ferrari, P.; Jarron, P.; Kapłon, J.; Macpherson, A.; Niinikoski, T.; Pernegger, H.; Roe, S.; Rudge, A.; Ruggiero, G.; Wallny, R.; Weilhammer, P.; Białas, W.; Dąbrowski, W.; Gryboś, P.; Koperny, S.; Błocki, J.; Brückman, P.; Gadomski, S.; Godlewski, J.; Górnicki, E.; Malecki, Pa.; Moszczyński, A.; Stanecka, E.; Stodulski, M.; Szczygieł, R.; Turała, M.; Wolter, M. W.; Ahmad, A.; Beneš, J.; Carpentieri, C.; Felď, L.; Ketterer, C.; Ludwig, J.; Meinhardt, J.; Runge, K.; Mikulec, B.; Mangin-Brinet, M.; D’Onofrio, M.; Donegà, M.; Moêd, S.; Sfyrla, A.; Ferrère, D.; Clark, A.; Perrin, E.; Weber, M.; Bates, R. L.; Cheplakov, A.; Saxon, D. H.; O’Shea, V.; Smith, K. M.; Iwata, Y.; Ohsugi, T.; Kohriki, T.; Kondo, T.; Terada, S.; Ujiie, N.; Ikegami, Y.; Unno, Y.; Takashima, R.; Brodbeck, T. J.; Chilingarov, A.; Hughes, G.; Ratoff, P. N.; Sloan, T.; Allport, P. P.; Casse, G.; Greenall, A.; Jackson, J. N.; Jones, T. J.; King, B. T.; Maxfield, S. J.; Smith, N. A.; Sutcliffe, P.; Vossebeld, J. H.; Beck, G. A.; Carter, A.A.; Lloyd, S. L.; Martín, A.; Morris, J. D.; Morin, J.; Nagai, K.; Pritchard, T. W.; Anderson, B.; Butterworth, J. M.; Fraser, T.J.; Jones, T. W.; Lane, J.B.; Postranecky, M.; Warren, M.; Cindro, V.; Kramberger, G.; Mandić, I.; Mikuž, M.; Duerdoth, I. P.; Freestone, J.; Foster, J. M.; Ibbotson, M.; Loebinger, F. K.; Pater, J. R.; Snow, S. W.; Thompson, R. J.; Atkinson, T.; Bright, Gabrielle; Kazi, S. I.; Lindsay, S. W.; Moorhead, G. F.; Taylor, G. N.; Bachindgagyan, G.; Баранова, Н. В.; Karmanov, D.; Merkine, M.; Andricek, L.; Bethke, S.; Kudłaty, J.; Lütz, G.; Moser, H. G.; Nisius, R.; Richter, R.; Schieck, J.; Cornelissen, T.; Gorfine, G.; Hartjes, F.; Hessey, N. P.; Jong, P. de; Muijs, A. J.M.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Tomeda, Y.; Tanaka, R.; Nakano, I.; Dorholt, O.; Danielsen, K.M.; Huse, T.; Sandaker, H.; Stapnes, S.; Bargassaa, P.; Reichold, A.; Huffman, T. B.; Nickerson, R. B.; Weidberg, A. R.; Doucas, G.; Hawes, B. M.; Lau, W.; Howell, D. F.; Kundu, N.; Wastie, R.; Böhm, J.; Mikeštíková, M.; Šťastný, J.; Broklová, Z.; Brož, Jan; Doležal, Z.; Kodyš, P.; Kubík, P.; Řezníček, P.; Vorobel, V.; Wilhelm, I.; Chren, D.; Horažďovský, T.; Linhart, V.; Pospı́šil, S.; Sinor, M.; Solar, M.; Sopko, B.; Štekl, I.; Ardashev, E.N.; Golovnya, S. N.; Gorokhov, S. A.; Kholodenko, A. G.; Rudenko, R.E.; Ryadovikov, V.; Vorobiev, A. P.; Adkin, P.J.; Apsimon, R.; Batchelor, L E; Bizzell, J.P.; Booker, P.; Davis, V.R.; Easton, J.M.; Fowler, C.; Gibson, Murray; Haywood, S. J.; Macwaters, C.; Matheson, J.; Matson, R.M.; McMahon, S. J.; Morris, F.S.; Morrissey, M.; Murray, W. J.; Phillips, P. W.; Tyndel, M.; Villani, E. G.; Dorfan, D. E.; Grillo, A. A.; Rosenbaum, F.J.; Sadrozinski, H. F-W.; Seiden, A.; Spencer, E.; Wilder, M.; Booth, P.S.L.; Buttar, C. M.; Dawson, I.; Dervan, P.; Grigson, C.; Harper, R.; Moraes, A.; Peak, L. S.; Varvell, K. E.; Chu, M. L.; Hou, L S; Lee, Shih-Chang; Teng, P. K.; Wan, Chang-Chun; Hara, K.; Kato, Yuta; Kuwano, Tadao; Minagawa, Makoto; Sengoku, H.; Bingefors, N.; Brenner, R.; Ekelöf, T.; Eklund, L.; Bernabéu, J.; Civera, Javier; Costa, M. J.; Fuster, J.; Garćıa, C.; Garcia, J. E.; González-Sevilla, S.; Lacasta, C.; Llosá, G.; Martí-García, S.; Modesto, P.; Sánchez, J.; Sospedra, L.; Vos, M.; Fasching, D.; González, S.; Jared, R. C.; Charles, E.

doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.08.133

Cited by 46 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the center, a loss of approximately 15% in collected charge is observed. The p-in-n and two strips in irradiated detectors has been reported in test beams of the ATLAS SCT [20]. From this, it is evident that a sizeable part of the drop in collected charge of the irradiated sensors is due to loss of charge when the track has an interstrip position between 0.2 and 0.8, where a 10-15% loss in charge is seen.…”

Section: Cluster Charge Versus Cluster Size and Interstrip Positionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Testbeam studies of pre-prototype silicon strip sensors for the LHCb UT upgrade project

Abba¹,

Artuso

Blusk

et al. 2016

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The LHCb experiment is preparing for a major upgrade in 2018-2019. One of the key components in the upgrade is a new silicon tracker situated upstream of the analysis magnet of the experiment. The Upstream Tracker (UT) will consist of four planes of silicon strip detectors, with each plane covering an area of about 2 m 2 . An important consideration of these detectors is their performance after they have been exposed to a large radiation dose. In this article we present test beam results of pre-prototype n-in-p and p-in-n sensors that have been irradiated with fluences up to 4.0 × 10 14 n eq /cm 2 . Published in Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. c CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, licence CC-BY-4.0. arXiv:1506.00229v4 [physics.ins-det] 5 Nov 2015 ii

show abstract

Section: Cluster Charge Versus Cluster Size and Interstrip Positionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Testbeam studies of pre-prototype silicon strip sensors for the LHCb UT upgrade project

Abba¹,

Artuso

Blusk

et al. 2016

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For fully-depleted modules, the average shift in collected charge is approximately 30 µm for the Pixel Detector and 10 µm for the SCT, in both cases not negligible with respect to the detector resolution and alignment precision. Measurements of the Lorentz angle for the ATLAS sensors have already been performed in test beams [38,46], but in conditions different from the actual operation in ATLAS.…”

Section: Lorentz Angle Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ATLAS Inner Detector commissioning and calibration

Aad¹,

Abbott²,

Abdallah³

et al. 2010

Eur. Phys. J. C

Self Cite

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ATLAS Inner Detector is a composite tracking system consisting of silicon pixels, silicon strips and straw tubes in a 2 T magnetic field. Its installation was completed in August 2008 and the detector took part in data-taking with single LHC beams and cosmic rays. The initial detector operation, hardware commissioning and insitu calibrations are described. Tracking performance has been measured with 7.6 million cosmic-ray events, collected using a tracking trigger and reconstructed with modular pattern-recognition and fitting software. The intrinsic hit efficiency and tracking trigger efficiencies are close to 100%. Lorentz angle measurements for both electrons and holes, specific energy-loss calibration and transition radiation turn-on measurements have been performed. Different alignment techniques have been used to reconstruct the detector geometry. After the initial alignment, a transverse impact parameter resolution of 22.1 ± 0.9 µm and a relative momentum resolution σ p /p = (4.83 ± 0.16) ×

show abstract

“…The modules were assembled at various locations, being put through an extensive suite of tests at various times in the production sequence. The performance of both irradiated and nonirradiated modules was evaluated in beam-tests [11], an example of which was given in Fig. 4.…”

Section: Sct Commissioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ATLAS SCT: Commissioning experience and SLHC upgrade

Mitrevski

2009

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) has been installed, and fully connected to electrical, optical and cooling services. Commissioning has been performed both with calibration data and cosmic ray events. The cosmics were used to align the detector, measure the hit efficiency and set the timing. The SCT is now ready to take data when the LHC turns on this autumn. At the same time, it is clear that the present ATLAS tracker will need to be renewed for projected luminosity upgrade of the LHC, the SLHC. This is mainly driven by occupancy and radiation hardness issues. The new tracker will likely be entirely made of silicon, with the space of the present SCT largely taken up by detectors with much shorter strips. Several large-scale R&D projects on the sensors and module concepts for this upgrade are running, including sensor and module prototyping. We will report upon the commissioning experience from the SCT, use it to extract valuable lessons for future silicon tracker projects, and give an up-to-date overview of the status and results of the R&D efforts for the ATLAS tracker upgrade.

show abstract

Beam tests of ATLAS SCT silicon strip detector modules

Cited by 46 publications

References 17 publications

Testbeam studies of pre-prototype silicon strip sensors for the LHCb UT upgrade project

Testbeam studies of pre-prototype silicon strip sensors for the LHCb UT upgrade project

The ATLAS Inner Detector commissioning and calibration

The ATLAS SCT: Commissioning experience and SLHC upgrade

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About