2013
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2013.807094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Analysis of Instrumental Variable Models: Acceptance-Rejection within Direct Monte Carlo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We illustrate this issue in Figure 1. More details are given in the Supplementary material, in Hoogerheide et al (2007b) and Zellner et al (2014).…”
Section: Posteriors Of An Instrumental Variables (Iv) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We illustrate this issue in Figure 1. More details are given in the Supplementary material, in Hoogerheide et al (2007b) and Zellner et al (2014).…”
Section: Posteriors Of An Instrumental Variables (Iv) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This irregularity can be mitigated by the use of a Jeffrey's prior see Hoogerheide et al (2007a). In this case, the posterior is a proper density, but sampling methods such as the Gibbs sampler are not applicable, see Zellner et al (2014). The applicability of the MitISEM algorithm to the IV model and the speed gains compared with the griddy-Gibbs sampler (Ritter and Tanner, 1992) are shown in Baştürk et al (2016).…”
Section: Bayesian Inference Of the Instrumental Variables Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases it is not trivial to perform inference on the joint posterior distribution of parameters using basic Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which may be inefficient and inaccurate due to the non-standard conditional densities. The difficulty of selecting an appropriate candidate density for algorithms where such a candidate needs to be defined is discussed in De Pooter et al (2008), Ardia et al (2012) and Zellner et al (2014) among several others. Efficient and accurate inference is, however, important in the context of measuring economic forecast uncertainty and economic policy effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the standard deviation of the IS weights divided by their mean, as in , who use the candidate from MitISEM for importance sampling or the independence chain MH method. Zellner, Ando, Baştürk, Hoogerheide, and Van Dijk (2014), who use the MitISEM candidate for rejection sampling, propose an alternative criterion for the convergence of the MitISEM algorithm. They use the unconditional acceptance probability, which is a more natural and intuitive convergence criterion in this case of rejection sampling.…”
Section: Mitisem: the Basic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an exactly identified model with a single instrument, the posterior density resulting from this model is improper. For more details on the derivation we refer to Zellner et al (2014). We specify a Jeffreys prior which leads to a proper posterior density, see e.g.…”
Section: Approximating Posterior Densities: An IV Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%