2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
338
2
24

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
338
2
24
Order By: Relevance
“…by shakeout processes and a decrease in the number of companies (KLEPPER, 2007), and because existing and newly formed companies orient themselves towards the most promising development approaches, the heterogeneity declines and the technology path becomes increasingly focused. This stabilization and focusing reduces the uncertainty of the further development and is accompanied by a growth of the respective industry (SUAREZ, 2004). As industries mature, these dynamics decrease.…”
Section: Industry Life Cycles and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…by shakeout processes and a decrease in the number of companies (KLEPPER, 2007), and because existing and newly formed companies orient themselves towards the most promising development approaches, the heterogeneity declines and the technology path becomes increasingly focused. This stabilization and focusing reduces the uncertainty of the further development and is accompanied by a growth of the respective industry (SUAREZ, 2004). As industries mature, these dynamics decrease.…”
Section: Industry Life Cycles and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this research, we mainly focused on factors related to the network composition of the deployment of standards, which some researchers (e.g. Suarez (2004)) have explained as being a crucial phase in a decisive battle between standards. Consequently, we did not comprehensively examine other factors (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reluctance to switch to a superior new technology and thereby cementing a status quo bias towards the existing technology that has a large installed base) (Farrell and Saloner, 1985;. Suarez (2004) parsed the process of a battle for dominance between standards into five phases (R&D build-up, technical feasibility, creating the market, decisive battle and post-dominance) and identified the installed base, complementary assets and network effects as key success factors in the stage of a decisive battle between heterogeneous standards. Similarly, Teece (1986) pointed out that in a paradigmatic design stage, access to complementary assets and control of distribution channels takes on greater prominence, while price becomes relatively less significant.…”
Section: Literature Review: Standards Network Effects and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the concept of hidden catalysts and research on the role of hidden catalysts in industrial change is important for understanding the phenomena for any transition, industrial convergence or integration into society. It is important to understand the characteristics of hidden catalysts in terms of creating new dominant design of products (Utterback and Abernathy, 1975) or dominance for a new industry (Suarez, 2004)or for integrated industry. The hidden catalysts create new dominance in the process of industry integration.…”
Section: Hidden Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%