1992
DOI: 10.2466/pms.75.7.867-872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basketball Size as Related to Children's Preference, Rated Skill, and Scoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, testing involved five trials with a women’s basketball followed by five trials with a junior basketball for every participant, thereby creating a potential learning effect that favored the junior ball. For two studies, it was unclear whether the risk of detection bias was high or low, because technique was subjectively assessed by “observers,” but it was unclear whether the observers were independent from the research team and/or blinded to treatment allocation [ 7 , 9 ]. However, it must be noted that Hammond and Smith [ 7 ] did not explicitly state whether it was hitting technique or hitting accuracy that was assessed in their skills tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter case, testing involved five trials with a women’s basketball followed by five trials with a junior basketball for every participant, thereby creating a potential learning effect that favored the junior ball. For two studies, it was unclear whether the risk of detection bias was high or low, because technique was subjectively assessed by “observers,” but it was unclear whether the observers were independent from the research team and/or blinded to treatment allocation [ 7 , 9 ]. However, it must be noted that Hammond and Smith [ 7 ] did not explicitly state whether it was hitting technique or hitting accuracy that was assessed in their skills tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children of a similar age have elsewhere reported preference for, and presumably greater engagement when, using scaled tennis equipment, including smaller racquets and lower compression balls [ 24 ] and lower nets [ 23 ]. In a basketball study involving 77 10-year-old children [ 9 ], 48 (62 %) preferred using a junior ball (as opposed to a women’s or men’s ball) and only seven (9 %) preferred using an adult men’s ball. Whilst the junior ball did improve shooting performance for all children, it was observed that shooting performance was significantly better when children used the ball of their preference, which was typically a ball smaller than the adult men’s ball.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Brief Recap of the Scaling Literature Scaling junior sport is not a new concept, but it has become popular over the past decade. Research began focusing on scaling in the 1960s (Wright, 1967), albeit in small doses (Elliott, 1981;Satern et al, 1989;Regimbal et al, 1992). It was not until the rise of formalized modified sport programs, which have predominately been developed based on intuitive reasoning rather than empirical evidence, that we have seen an exponential increase in the number of studies investigating scaling sport.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Scaling?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Each player should perform all the previously established movements in a random order to prevent the influence of possible accumulated fatigue during the test (30), as is common in other tests that involve the continuous performance of different motor behaviors (10,36). That is, the sequence of movements should be different for all the players.…”
Section: Providing a Velocity Range For Each Type Of Movement By Meanmentioning
confidence: 99%