Abstract:Ontogenetic variation in plasticity is important to understanding mechanisms and patterns of thermal tolerance variation. The Bogert effect postulates that, to compensate for their inability to behaviourally thermoregulate, less mobile life-stages of ectotherms are expected to show greater plasticity of thermal tolerance than more mobile life-stages. We test this general prediction by comparing plasticity of thermal tolerance (rapid cold-hardening, RCH) between mobile adults and less-mobile larvae of 16 Drosophila species. We find an RCH response in adults of thirteen species, but only in larvae of four species. Thus, the Bogert effect is not as widespread as expected.
Powered by Editorial Manager® and Preprint Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation
08-02-2013Dear Dr. Thatje,
RE: Manuscript re-submission (MS# NAWI-D-12-00388)Thank you for your email containing the responses from reviewers for our manuscript "Ontogenetic variation in cold tolerance plasticity in Drosophila: is the Bogert effect bogus?" by Mitchell, Sinclair and Terblanche for reconsideration of publication in Naturwissenschaften. We are pleased with the reviewer's general enthusiasm for the manuscript and are grateful for the opportunity to make improvements according to their input and resubmit to Naturwissenschaften.We have carefully addressed the reviewer's comments and updated our manuscript accordingly. Below, we provide a response to each reviewer's comments and highlight the corresponding changes to the manuscript (responses provided in italics). The overarching theme from all reviewer's was their concern regarding the different methodology adopted to assess rapid cold hardening between the adult and larval life stages i.e. species-specific vs. standard pre-treatment for adults and larvae, respectively. We do openly acknowledge these issues in the manuscript (bearing in mind that we did not conduct these studies de novo, but are instead making use of published data) and we have accounted for this potential confounding factor by not using absolute levels of plasticity but rather the presence/absence of rapid cold hardening within each life stage. Perhaps we did not make it clear in the earlier version that this was the basis for all analyses and have clarified this in the revised manuscript. As the intention of this article was to refocus attention on the importance of the Bogert effect and encourage further investigation rather than intensely scrutinize it, we acknowledge that our study contains some caveats. Despite these caveats, we do feel that this is the best available dataset to assess the question in a systematic fashion across a range of species. We anticipate that the revived interest that should be generated by our paper will result in new data and aid to quickly advance the research in this field; this paper should therefore result in significant citations and be a benchmark assessment of this idea.All authors agree to the alteration and resubmission of this manuscript which contains new results not currently in review...