1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.1496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barrier-width dependence of group-III nitrides quantum-well transition energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
131
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of the internal field, especially the piezoelectric field caused by strain, on quantum well recombination behaviour has been confirmed experimentally and reported in various III-nitride-based heterostructures [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Redshifts of emission energy and lower emission intensity were found in strained quantum wells based on III-nitrides, confirming the strong influence of the strain-induced piezoelectric field.…”
Section: Internal Electric Fieldsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The impact of the internal field, especially the piezoelectric field caused by strain, on quantum well recombination behaviour has been confirmed experimentally and reported in various III-nitride-based heterostructures [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Redshifts of emission energy and lower emission intensity were found in strained quantum wells based on III-nitrides, confirming the strong influence of the strain-induced piezoelectric field.…”
Section: Internal Electric Fieldsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Both observations (blue shift in PL peak energy and quenching in PL intensity) can be considered as a strong experimental evidence of the enhancement of escaping photogenerated carriers from the wells and contributing to the photocurrent due to enhanced tunneling probability of carriers, as the field in barrier increases, according to our model discussed in the next section. Similar observation has also been reported in literature [22][23][24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The average electric field was calculated by taking into account spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization [22,25,26], built-in electric field due to the Schottky contact and applied field between the contacts. If a MQW structure is incorporated in the intrinsic region of Schottky diode, it leads to the following expression [27] …”
Section: Models and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for this difference could be in a difference of internal electric fields, which Paskov et al 22 did not consider when discussing the hole escape from the Coulomb binding. Such fields, which could arise from different doping concentrations 25 or different distances between successive BSFs, 26 certainly exist in and around such BSFs, whatever their type-I or type-II alignment, as commented by Sun et al 27 Now, a binding energy of 18 meV seems quite small compared to the bulk value ͑26 meV͒ for a type-II exciton in such shallow and narrow quantum wells, especially if one considers the presence of electric fields that, for type-II structures, tend to minimize the electron-hole separation ͑see Fig. 10 of Ref.…”
Section: Localization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%