1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3951(199901)211:1<105::aid-pssb105>3.3.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band-to-Band and Band-to-Acceptor Photoluminescence Studies in InSe under Pressure

Abstract: We report on photoluminescence (PL) measurements under pressure on p-type N-doped InSe at 10 K and on n-type Si-doped InSe at room temperature. Low-temperature PL of N-doped InSe is dominated by a band-to-acceptor peak. From the pressure dependence of the ionization energy of the N related shallow acceptor, the pressure change of the hole effective mass is estimated through the Gerlach-Pollmann model for hydrogenic levels in uniaxial crystals and discussed in the framework of a k Á p model. Room temperature PL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the effective mass of the density of states at the B point, the value obtained for m * B (0.85m 0 ) is around 7 times the value of m * Z and does not change with pressure within the accuracy provided by our model. This value, which should be considered as a rough estimation of m * B , fairly agrees with the value deduced from photoluminescence studies (m * B = (0.75 ± 0.05)m 0 ) [38]. The present estimates of m * B are also consistent with previous band-structure calculations [8] that show that the Z minimum is sharper than the secondary minima.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the effective mass of the density of states at the B point, the value obtained for m * B (0.85m 0 ) is around 7 times the value of m * Z and does not change with pressure within the accuracy provided by our model. This value, which should be considered as a rough estimation of m * B , fairly agrees with the value deduced from photoluminescence studies (m * B = (0.75 ± 0.05)m 0 ) [38]. The present estimates of m * B are also consistent with previous band-structure calculations [8] that show that the Z minimum is sharper than the secondary minima.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…), respectively. Similar bands have been observed in the literature for undoped InSe and InSe crystals doped with different atoms [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The intensity and resolution of the C emission band is relatively weak compared to the other bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of attention has been given to the photoluminescence (PL) properties of undoped and doped InSe crystals [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Various features were observed in the PL spectra of pure and doped InSe crystals depending on the growth conditions, quality of the resulting crystals and measurement conditions [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. New bands were observed in the PL spectrum of rare-earth doped InSe crystals in the 1020-1060 nm range [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Photoreflectance showed a zerocrossing and photoluminescence showed a peak near 1.2-1.25 eV, 32) similar to previously published results. 33,34) InSe film thicknesses were usually in the 50-100 nm range, while GaSe thicknesses were typically 5-10 nm.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%