2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1704877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band alignment at the i-ZnO/CdS interface in Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin-film solar cells

Abstract: The laboratory performance of CIGS (Cu(In,Ga)Se 2) based solar cells (20.8% efficiency) makes them promising candidate photovoltaic devices. However, there remains little understanding of how defects at the CIGS/CdS interface affect the band offsets and interfacial energies, and hence the performance of manufactured devices. To determine these relationships, we use density functional theory with the B3PW91 hybrid functional that we validate to provide very accurate descriptions of the band gaps and band offset… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
12
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the surface band-gap energy derived after the sputter treatment is expected to be a good approximation of the CuInSe 2 band gap directly at the CdS/CuInSe 2 interface. This is consistent with earlier investigations, in which metallic species (both Cu and In) are found after prolonged sputter-treatment of the CuInSe 2 surface [45][46][47][48]. This is consistent with earlier investigations, in which metallic species (both Cu and In) are found after prolonged sputter-treatment of the CuInSe 2 surface [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Probing the Electronic Surface And Interface Structure: Bandsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Hence, the surface band-gap energy derived after the sputter treatment is expected to be a good approximation of the CuInSe 2 band gap directly at the CdS/CuInSe 2 interface. This is consistent with earlier investigations, in which metallic species (both Cu and In) are found after prolonged sputter-treatment of the CuInSe 2 surface [45][46][47][48]. This is consistent with earlier investigations, in which metallic species (both Cu and In) are found after prolonged sputter-treatment of the CuInSe 2 surface [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Probing the Electronic Surface And Interface Structure: Bandsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The CBO of CdS and undoped ZnO is taken to be À0.2 eV, between the values reported by Refs. [29,30]. The interface recombination velocity at the CZTSe/CdS interface in the baseline case is set at a low value, S ¼100 cm/s, unless otherwise stated.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conduction band offset ∆Ec between CdS and ZnO has been measured by at least 2 groups. According to [36]. We conclude that based on published data, a small negative conduction band offset may occur and indeed is often assumed in energy band diagrams of CuIn0.75Ga0.25Se2/CdS/ZnO solar cells [1,10,29,37].…”
Section: Cu-rich Cu(inga)(ses)2 and Cu-poor Cu2znsn(ses)4mentioning
confidence: 82%