2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these scenarios, there is potential and great need (climate change adaptation measures) to increase the use of approaches that currently are less attractive than the typical plantation of Norway spruce in terms of production but are more beneficial for other ecosystem services and/or decrease climate change related risks. This includes inter alia increasing the share of set-asides and continuous cover forestry, establishing mixed forests and native broadleaves [6,73,74].…”
Section: Projection Results With Possible Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these scenarios, there is potential and great need (climate change adaptation measures) to increase the use of approaches that currently are less attractive than the typical plantation of Norway spruce in terms of production but are more beneficial for other ecosystem services and/or decrease climate change related risks. This includes inter alia increasing the share of set-asides and continuous cover forestry, establishing mixed forests and native broadleaves [6,73,74].…”
Section: Projection Results With Possible Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an MCA provides a proven suite of methods for sustainability evaluation in the context of forest management [31,[52][53][54][55]. In particular, its use in SIA of forest-wood chains has been demonstrated previously [33,56,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forests also support high biodiversity levels, which ensures forest resilience and is of high value in itself (Oliver et al 2015). Evaluations of the effects of management scenarios on the sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services and biodiversity (ESB) need to account for levels of ESB provision, trade-offs between individual ESB (Eggers et al 2017) and also the ability of forests to deliver ESB continuously over long time periods (Albrich et al 2018). Disturbance events such as wind storms and bark beetle calamities may disrupt the continuity in ESB provision (Schelhaas et al 2003;Thom and Seidl 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%