1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial invasion into dentinal tubules of human vital and nonvital teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
0
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
49
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Another advantage of the smear layer is the ability to reduce the permeability of debris to the dentinal tubules (KIM et al, 2002). A smear layer of small particle size prevents bacteria from penetrating the dentine in studies of human teeth (NAGOAKA et al, 1995). Studies carried out in extracted human teeth have shown that dentinal tubules are the major conduits for fluid diffusion across dentin (PASHLEY, 1992;HOLLAND, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of the smear layer is the ability to reduce the permeability of debris to the dentinal tubules (KIM et al, 2002). A smear layer of small particle size prevents bacteria from penetrating the dentine in studies of human teeth (NAGOAKA et al, 1995). Studies carried out in extracted human teeth have shown that dentinal tubules are the major conduits for fluid diffusion across dentin (PASHLEY, 1992;HOLLAND, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although vital teeth are more resistant to bacterial invasion into dentinal tubules than are non-vital teeth (Nagaoka & others), 42 and the outward fluid movement retards the inward diffusion of bacterial toxins (Pashley & others), 41 mechanically-exposed dentin requires provisionalization to reduce sensitivity and bacterial microleakage (Cagidiaco & others). 5 It has been stated that tooth sensitivity related to preparation is profound in the first week but decreases with time (Lundy & Stanley).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Some researchers suggested use of acidic conditioners (Watanabe & others) 31 or degreasing agents (Mojon & others) 33 [36][37][38][39][40] Compared to the conventional method, in which the dentin-bonding agent is applied during the final luting procedure, this method requires hybridization of the exposed dentin surface immediately after tooth preparation and hybridization during final luting procedures (Bertschinger & others; Paul & Scharer). [36][37] The primary advantage of this technique is to protect the tooth from the consequences of microleakage by sealing the dentin tubules that are vulnerable to bacterial invasion (Cox & others; Pashley & others; Nagaoka & others; Cox) 38,[41][42][43] immediately after completion of the preparation. Sealing of the dentin tubules also reduces sensitivity (Cagidiaco & others) 5 by preventing hydraulic fluid flow within the dentin tubules, which is associated with post-operative sensitivity (Brännström; Suzuki, Cox & White; Pashley & others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was related to formation of longer resin tags and a thicker hybrid zone. Moreover, IDS method can protect the tooth from the consequences of microleakage by sealing the dentin tubules that are vulnerable to bacteria invasion, immediately after completion of the preparation 16) . Sealing of the dentin tubules also reduces sensitivity by preventing hydraulic fluid flow within the dentin tubules, which is associated with postoperative sensitivity 17) .…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%