2008
DOI: 10.5395/jkacd.2008.33.6.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of various bonding systems on the microtensile bond strength of immediate and delayed dentin sealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the composite type, the results of this study indicated that group B experienced less microleakage when using the direct-indirect veneer approach than group A Nanohybrid-microfilled composite 0:15 ± 0:36 BioMed Research International when using the direct veneer technique. This is because the final strength of the tooth-restoration complex is significantly dependent on adhesive techniques when using the direct-indirect approach [28]. Additionally, this approach minimizes polymerization shrinkage since the polymerization happens outside the cavity, leaving only the resin cement to contract and connect the restoration to the tooth structure [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the composite type, the results of this study indicated that group B experienced less microleakage when using the direct-indirect veneer approach than group A Nanohybrid-microfilled composite 0:15 ± 0:36 BioMed Research International when using the direct veneer technique. This is because the final strength of the tooth-restoration complex is significantly dependent on adhesive techniques when using the direct-indirect approach [28]. Additionally, this approach minimizes polymerization shrinkage since the polymerization happens outside the cavity, leaving only the resin cement to contract and connect the restoration to the tooth structure [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-etching systems are required to completely dissolve and incorporate the smear layer in order to interact with the underlying mineralized dentin. 31,32) However, in the presence of this more acid-resistant surface, the weak acids present in the self-etching system cannot sufficiently modify the surface to promote adhesive penetration. Since Clearfil SE bond used in current study is categorized in mild self-etching bonding system according to its acidity (pH = 1.8), the μ TBS of laser-irradiated Clearfil SE bond group was the lowest of all tested groups.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%