2004
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Changes in Coronary Artery Calcium: An Analytic Method That Accounts for Interscan Variability

Abstract: Using the square root of the calcium volume score stabilized interscan variability across the range of coronary calcium. Defining change in coronary calcium as greater than or equal to 2.5 mm(3) of the difference in the square root-transformed calcium volume scores provided an estimate that was unbiased with respect to baseline coronary calcium. This analytic technique may facilitate investigations of the relevance of changes in coronary calcium to clinical outcomes and the use of changes in coronary calcium a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
165
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
165
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,25 Treatment with phosphate binders resulted in significant progression of vascular calcification in coronary arteries and the abdominal aorta. Assessment of coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression using the square-root followup method in the work by Hokanson et al 26 has been shown to be the best method to predict mortality in a large cohort of asymptomatic patients. 26,27 These results support the conceptual risk of inducing positive calcium balance in patients with CKD, where disordered mineral metabolism results in dystrophic calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,25 Treatment with phosphate binders resulted in significant progression of vascular calcification in coronary arteries and the abdominal aorta. Assessment of coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression using the square-root followup method in the work by Hokanson et al 26 has been shown to be the best method to predict mortality in a large cohort of asymptomatic patients. 26,27 These results support the conceptual risk of inducing positive calcium balance in patients with CKD, where disordered mineral metabolism results in dystrophic calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression using the square-root followup method in the work by Hokanson et al 26 has been shown to be the best method to predict mortality in a large cohort of asymptomatic patients. 26,27 These results support the conceptual risk of inducing positive calcium balance in patients with CKD, where disordered mineral metabolism results in dystrophic calcification. Short-term calcium balance studies suggest that the provision of 2000 mg/d elemental calcium in patients with CKD stage 3 results in substantial net positive calcium balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the dependence of residual interscan variability on the baseline CAC score, square root transformation of the CAC score was performed before the estimation of CAC progression. Using the data published by Hokanson et al., progressors were defined as individuals with a difference of ≥2.5 units between the baseline and final square root of their CAC scores (ie, the “SQRT method” [the square root‐transformed difference]) 9, 22, 23. To put it differently, a change of <2.5 units between the baseline and final square root of the CAC score was considered to be within the margin of error for the estimation of the CAC score using MDCT and thus was attributed to interscan variability; such participants were classified as nonprogressors 9, 22, 23…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary artery calcification volume scores (CVS), presented in Agatson units (AU), were measured by electronbeam CT (C-150 Ultrafast CT scanner; Imatron, San Francisco, CA, USA) before and after 2.4±0.4 years followup, and progression of CAC was defined according to the method of Hokanson et al as an increase of ≥2.5 mm 3 in the square root-transformed calcium volume scores [33]. To avoid interference with other calcifications located outside atheromatous lesions, a region of interest was encircled in each coronary artery, and computer-driven measurements of the lesion area and its maximum density were recorded.…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total CAC score was presented as a mean value of measurements from two independent CT scans performed within 5 min of each other during each visit [5,33]. Among the participants of the CACTI study, APOA4 genotyping data were available for 1,373 subjects (96.7% of the study population), 634 with type 1 diabetes and 739 from the control group, and 1,141 of whom completed the follow-up visit and were evaluated for CAC progression (ESM Fig.…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%