<b>Academic Publishing: Past and Future</b>

Forgues, Bérnard; Liarte, Sébastien

doi:10.3917/mana.165.0739

Cited by 17 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On this basis, journal publishing continues to be a very profitable business when judged on the financial results of the leading European publishers, Elsevier and Springer, who recorded revenue growth in excess of 30% per annum from 2008 to 2012 (Forgues & Liarte, 2013). The profitability of journal publishing as a business enterprise was also demonstrated by the 2015 industry earnings of $9 billion USD, which produced a return of 20% to 30% (Fecher & Wagner, 2016).…”

Section: Overview Of the Publishing Landscapementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The growth of subscription journals was fueled by the expansion of commercial publishers who acquired society journals and eventually became an oligopoly of five big companies that command more than 50% of journal output, mainly in the science-related disciplines (Larivière et al, 2015;Peters et al, 2017;Solomon, 2012Solomon, , 2013. The dominance of the subscription model continues to the present in terms of market share and profitability (Forgues & Liarte, 2013). The subscription model was sustained by payments from universities and libraries, but more recently, this model has come to be viewed as a restraint on access to research, of questionable viability, and even deemed to be unsustainable because of increasing costs (Chang, 2006;Wellen, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Untitled

2017

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Except where otherwise noted, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. The PDF version is created withScribus, an open source desktop publishing program. OverviewThe Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review) provides insights about the issues and emerging trends relevant to launching and growing technology businesses. The TIM Review focuses on the theories, strategies, and tools that help small and large technology companies succeed.Our readers are looking for practical ideas they can apply within their own organizations. The TIM Review brings together diverse viewpoints -from academics, entrepreneurs, companies of all sizes, the public sector, the community sector, and others -to bridge the gap between theory and practice. In particular, we focus on the topics of technology and global entrepreneurship in small and large companies.We welcome input from readers into upcoming themes. Please visit timreview.ca to suggest themes and nominate authors and guest editors. ContributeContribute to the TIM Review in the following ways:• Read and comment on articles.• Review the upcoming themes and tell us what topics you would like to see covered.• Write an article for a future issue; see the author guidelines and editorial process for details.• Recommend colleagues as authors or guest editors.• Give feedback on the website or any other aspect of this publication.• Sponsor or advertise in the TIM Review.• Tell a friend or colleague about the TIM Review.Please contact the Editor if you have any questions or comments: timreview.ca/contact About TIMThe TIM Review has international contributors and readers, and it is published in association with the Technology Innovation Management program (TIM; timprogram.ca), an international graduate program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Technology Innovation Management ReviewNovember 2017 (Volume 7, Issue 11) 3 timreview.caThe fourth article is by Tuomo Eskelinen, Teemu Räsänen, Ulla Santti, Ari Happonen, and Miika Kajanus, who used action research methods to discover new business opportunities for an environmental monitoring service relying on open data. They applied a four-stage innovation process for industry, which included context definition, idea generation, and selection, and produced multi-criteria decision support (MCDS) data to help design a new business model. Their business model creation process can help businesses find new ideas based on open data, turn them into business models, and then improve those models using a participative approach.Finally, Haven Allahar analyzes the role of open access in the domain of academic publishing from the perspective of disruptive innovation. Following a characterization of the traditional journal publishing system, Allahar describes the evolving phenomenon of open access models on journal publishing, the nature and extent of open access as a disruptive innovation, and the implications for key stakeholders.In December, we feature articles based on papers presented at the 2017 ISPIM ...

show abstract

Section: Overview Of the Publishing Landscapementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ennek ellenére a kereslet erősen rugalmatlan (Forgues-Liarte [2013]), ami első-sorban arra vezethető vissza, hogy a kutatómunkához, a szakterület fejlődésének nyomon követéséhez feltétlenül szükségesek a szakfolyóiratok. az előfizetési díjak annak ellenére magasak, hogy az internet tudományos közlésben való szerepe növe-kedett, és jelentősen csökkentette a folyóiratok kiadási (nyomtatási) és disztribúciós költségeit (McCabe-Snyder [2014]).…”

Section: Az Előfizetés éS a Nyílt Hozzáférés Viszonya Intézményi Szintenunclassified

A nyílt hozzáférésű publikálás finanszírozási kérdései

Kovács¹

2017

Közgazdasági Szemle

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Közgazdasági szemle , lX iV. éVf., 2017. február (185-207. o.) KoVács Kármen a nyílt hozzáférésű publikálás finanszírozási kérdései A tanulmány a nyílt hozzáférésű tudományos publikálás finanszírozási kérdése-ivel foglalkozik. Arra összpontosít, hogyan érintik a kutatókat mint szerzőket a szakfolyóiratok által alkalmazott, szerzőoldali finanszírozást igénylő, nyílt hozzáférésű publikálás üzleti modelljei. A cikk egyrészt a vitatható tényezőkre és a problémákra kívánja felhívni a figyelmet, másrészt lehetséges megoldásokat és pozitív példákat szeretne bemutatni. egyes tudományterületeken alacsony a finanszírozott kutatások aránya, így nehéz forrást szerezni a publikáláshoz. A kiadók és a tudományos társaságok egy része -bizonyos feltételek teljesülése mellettmár talált megoldásokat a publikációs díj mérséklésére vagy elengedésére. A szakemberek egy köre amellett érvel, hogy a szakfolyóiratok előfizetésére fordított összegeket át kell csoportosítani nyílt hozzáférésű publikálásra, problémát jelent azonban, hogy az előfizetések és a publikációs díjak forráshelyei nem feltétlenül azonosak. mindez a közgazdaság-és gazdálkodástudomány művelőit is érinti.* Journal of economic literature (Jel) kód: A13, I23, z11.

show abstract

“…Forgues ve Liarte "Academic Publishing: Past And Future" başlıklı çalışmalarında bu aşamaları 1/Üretim -içeriğin oluşturulması, 2/Dağıtım -basılı veya elektronik ortamda içeriğin biçimlendirilmesi ve dağıtımı, 3/Tüketim: dağıtılan içeriği satın alma -kullanma olarak ifade etmektedirler (Forgues & Liarte, 2013 Teknolojik gelişmeler akademik yayıncılığın üretilme, değerlendirilme ve dağıtılma süreçlerinde pek çok değişim ve dönüşümü de beraberinde getirmiştir. SSRN, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley ve Open Access dergileri gibi hizmetler yalnızca yeni oyuncuların buz dağlarının ve aslında yeni hizmetlerin ve yayınlanma biçimlerinin görünür ipuçlarıdır.…”

Section: Akademik Süreli Yayın Süreçleri Ve Teknolojik Değişimunclassified

“…Daha öncesinde bilimsel yayınlar neredeyse tamamen bilimsel toplumlar tarafından desteklenmekteyken, II. Dünya Savaşı sonrası ticaret sektörü bilimsel yayıncılığın payını önemli ölçüde artırmıştır (Forgues & Liarte, 2013). Benzer tarihler aynı zamanda hakem/akran değerlendirmesinin akademik süreli yayıncılığa tekrar katılması ve baskın uygulama haline gelmesi bakımından da önemli dönemlerdir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified