2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2003.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azimuthal anisotropy using shear dipole sonic: insights from the AIG 10 well, Corinth Rift Laboratory

Abstract: Within the Corinth Rift Laboratory, dipole sonic data have been acquired in the AIG 10 well between depths 711 and 1004 m during three passes of a sonic logging tool at three different borehole fluid pressures. Specific sections of the well reveal clear characteristics of either moderate-to-large azimuthal anisotropy (9-25%) below the Aigion Fault, e.g., 779-784 and 809-816 m, with a fast-shear azimuth directed 105 • , or homogeneous isotropic medium (i.e., 735-753 m) between the casing shoe and the fault. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the analysis of the Stoneley-mode reflections and attenuation allows the identification of open fractures in the borehole and an estimation of their apertures ͑Hornby et al ., 1989;Tezuka et al, 1997͒. In addition, the interpretation of borehole images ͑electrical and ultrasonic͒ can be used to identify either natural or stress-induced fractures ͑Luthi, 2001͒, and extract geometrical properties. Qualitative comparison between observations of fractures on image logs and with sonic anisotropy data is common ͑Mueller et al, 1994;Esmersoy et al, 1995;Prioul et al, 2004b;Donald and Bratton, 2006͒. However, quantitative interpretation is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the analysis of the Stoneley-mode reflections and attenuation allows the identification of open fractures in the borehole and an estimation of their apertures ͑Hornby et al ., 1989;Tezuka et al, 1997͒. In addition, the interpretation of borehole images ͑electrical and ultrasonic͒ can be used to identify either natural or stress-induced fractures ͑Luthi, 2001͒, and extract geometrical properties. Qualitative comparison between observations of fractures on image logs and with sonic anisotropy data is common ͑Mueller et al, 1994;Esmersoy et al, 1995;Prioul et al, 2004b;Donald and Bratton, 2006͒. However, quantitative interpretation is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dipole sonic azimuthal anisotropy is interpreted using a combination of factors ͑Esmersoy et al, 1994; Prioul et al, 2004b͒: small minimum and large maximum energy in the cross-components of Alford rotation ͑green shaded area, track 1͒, stable FSA ͑ meas FSA ͒ with small uncertainty ͑track 3͒, arrival-time difference observed on waveforms ͑tracks 4 and 5͒, and difference between fast-and slowshear slownesses ͑DTs meas fast and DTs meas slow , track 4͒. The Alford-rotation processing uses 11 receivers ͑i.e., a 5-ft array͒ and provides the FSA of waves that have traveled through 10-15 ft ͑3-5 m͒ of formation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sonic-and Image-log Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous works (e.g., Crampin and Lovell, 1991, Prioul et al, 2004, Sayers and Kachanov, 1995 performed in the laboratory and in reservoir conditions highlighted that ultrasonic velocity anisotropy is partly (even entirely) due to the three-dimensional stress state applied to a rockmass or to individual fractures (Pyrak-Nolte, 1996). This stress opens existing cracks or results in newly formed micro-cracks (< 0.1 mm width) aligned parallel to the principal stress direction (Sayers and Vanmunster, 1991).…”
Section: Discussion On the Processes Inducing Anisotropy And Their Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the S H orientation in wells using a sonic logging tool requires measurement of the acoustic stress sensitivity of the formation, as well as the shear velocities in stress-induced anisotropic formation . The shear wave travels at different velocities with different propagating directions and polarizations in an anisotropic formation.…”
Section: In Situ Stress Orientation From Anisotropy Analysis For Well Amentioning
confidence: 99%