2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1087043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awards: A View from Psychological Economics

Abstract: Awards in the form of orders, decorations, prizes, and titles are ubiquitous in monarchies and republics, private organizations, not-for-profit, and profit-oriented firms. This paper argues that awards present a unique combination of different stimuli and that they are distinct and unlike other monetary and non-monetary rewards. Despite their relevance in all areas of life awards have not received much scientific attention. We propose to study awards and present results on a vignette experiment that quantifies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…By creating and establishing role models, they communicate information about successful and desirable behaviors. For nonwinners, however, there is the potential for disappointment and even decreased performance effort (Frey & Neckermann, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By creating and establishing role models, they communicate information about successful and desirable behaviors. For nonwinners, however, there is the potential for disappointment and even decreased performance effort (Frey & Neckermann, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this high response rate, we speculated, was loyalty and goodwill engendered from having won the prize. This speculation is supported by Frey and Neckerman who described awards as, among other things, inducing loyalty to the award-granting organizations (Frey & Neckermann, 2008). To get more detailed information, the initial survey asked respondents whether they would be willing to be contacted with follow-up questions.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galasso and Nannicini (2015) discuss the efficacy of formal electoral systems in performing the task of selecting skilled politicians. But beyond political systems, there is also evidence that tentatively points into the direction that positive incentives are useful in selecting good politicians, where positive incentives do not necessarily need to be monetary, but can also be of a pure reputational value, such as awards (Frey & Neckermann 2008). However, a constitution that disregards knavish behavior is still not preferable: Minorities, who are not part of the winning coalition, need protection from an agent whose objectives are closely aligned with those of the winning coalition.…”
Section: Incentives and Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charness et al (2013 offer experimental evidence suggesting that if individuals in an organization receive information on relative performance, but are paid flat wages, they will invest in destructive effort and sabotage their internal competitors' work. Thus, even non-monetary incentives may have adverse effects in bureaucratic organizations, which may also pose a problem to using awards as incentives, as proposed by Frey & Neckermann (2008). In general, the empirical literature on the effects of performance-related rewards in bureaucracies is still inconclusive (Hasnain et al 2012), and a golden rule for proper incentives for bureaucrats is not available at this point.…”
Section: Bureaucrats Regulators and Lobbyistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete channels to implement them are public disclosure and awards or prizes. For example, Frey and Neckermann (2008) have studied social awards in the form of public recognition as a mechanism to improve cooperation in a work place setting. They point out that the main difference with monetary compensation is that awards stimulate social recognition and social reinforcement and so are less likely to crowd out intrinsic motivations.…”
Section: Limited Self-interestmentioning
confidence: 99%