Behavioral political economy: A survey

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Explaining individual behavior in politics should rely on the same motivational assumptions as explaining behavior in the market: That's what Political Economy, understood as the application of economics to the study of political processes, is all about. In its standard variant, those who played the game of politics should also be considered rational and selfinterested, unlike the benevolent despot of earlier models. History repeats itself with the rise of behavioral economics: Assuming cognitive biases to be present in the market, but not in politics, behavioral economists often call for government to intervene in a "benevolent" way. Recently, however, political economists have started to apply behavioral economics insights to the study of political processes, thereby re-establishing a unified methodology. This paper surveys the current state of the emerging field of "Behavioral Political Economy" and considers the scope for further research. Terms of use: Documents inJEL-Code: D780, D030, A120, D720.

How Voters Use Grade Scales in Evaluative Voting

“…The main way by which we can access political preferences is through their translation into vote choices (Schnellenbach 2015), constrained by voting rules. Studying different calibrations, i.e.…”

Choice in politics: Equivalency framing in economic policy decisions and the influence of expertise

“…While framing research and Prospect Theory have made some advances in the analysis and explanation of political decision-making, the alleged (although reducing) dislike of methods from psychology (Mercer, 2005) in the political sciences has left the application of behavioural accounts of choice behaviour trailing far behind other social sciences, especially economics (Schnellenbach and Schubert, 2014). The continued use of rational choice as favourite tool for normative and prescriptive theories of political decision-making is often motivated with its advantages in modelling and prediction accuracy.…”

“…As Schnellenbach and Schubert (2014) point out, the behavioural approach is also only slowly entering the realms of public choice and political economy.…”

Entrenched time delays versus accelerating opinion dynamics: are advanced democracies inherently unstable?

“…The dynamics of democratic political systems shares certain basic similarities to manufacturing processes like just-in-time manufacturing, with the political institutions (parliament, government) reacting to shifts in the demands of the electorate [4]. It has been noticed in particular that the temporalities of economy and culture are driven by every faster cycles of innovation, change and replacement [5], with political time remaining on the other side high [6].…”