2020
DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da qualidade do atendimento em serviços de saúde para sobreviventes de violência sexual

Abstract: O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi identificar quais indicadores positivos e negativos estão presentes em artigos científicos sobre avaliação do atendimento em serviços de saúde aos sobreviventes de violência sexual. A pesquisa foi realizada na base de dados eletrônica MEDLINE, com os descritores “Sexual Violence”, “Sexual Abuse” e “Health Services”. Foram encontrados 15 estudos empíricos, realizados em 12 países e publicados no período de 2002 a 2020. Os resultados revelaram como indicadores positivos: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research conducted in South Africa, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, El Salvador, United States, Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Nigeria on the quality of care in health services for people in situations of sexual violence pointed out as positive indicators: humanized treatment; believing the testimony of the victims; receive information about procedures; having the option to choose interventions; adequate staff training; having a mental health service; secrecy and privacy; have the adequate infrastructure; and resoluteness [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research conducted in South Africa, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, El Salvador, United States, Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Nigeria on the quality of care in health services for people in situations of sexual violence pointed out as positive indicators: humanized treatment; believing the testimony of the victims; receive information about procedures; having the option to choose interventions; adequate staff training; having a mental health service; secrecy and privacy; have the adequate infrastructure; and resoluteness [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These surveys revealed as negative indicators: non-humanized care; not believing the testimony of the victims; not receiving information about the procedures; not having the option to choose; lack of adequate staff training; improve mental health services; absence of secrecy and privacy; absence of supplies; ignorance of health professionals about sexual violence in people of the male gender; absence of specific protocols; more clearly define the roles and responsibilities of health professionals and forensic specialists; absence of discipline on sexual violence in undergraduate courses in health; access problems due to lack of information about these services; and access problems due to the stigma and silence surrounding people in situations of sexual violence [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%