2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41787-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxin Biology: Applications and the Mechanisms Behind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although binding affinities for IAA, NAA and 2,4-D for all known auxin co-receptor combinations are unknown, available biochemical data for TIR1–IAA7 and AFB5–IAA7 show that NAA and 2,4-D have similar binding affinities for each of the co-receptors, which are only half of that of the natural auxin IAA ( Lee et al , 2014 ), implying a generally weaker binding for NAA and 2,4-D than for IAA. However, NAA and 2,4-D often appear to be more effective than IAA in terms of induction of developmental responses ( Skůpa et al , 2014 ; Peterson et al , 2016 ), because both are less metabolized and 2,4-D is also less exported, as discussed above. Another interesting physiological difference between IAA and 2,4-D is that 2,4-D shows the highest activity on promoting cell division in suspension culture-grown tobacco BY-2 cells among the 12 auxinic compounds tested, including IAA, which surprisingly shows no stimulatory effect at all ( Simon et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Chemical Probes Targeting Auxin Perception Machinerymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although binding affinities for IAA, NAA and 2,4-D for all known auxin co-receptor combinations are unknown, available biochemical data for TIR1–IAA7 and AFB5–IAA7 show that NAA and 2,4-D have similar binding affinities for each of the co-receptors, which are only half of that of the natural auxin IAA ( Lee et al , 2014 ), implying a generally weaker binding for NAA and 2,4-D than for IAA. However, NAA and 2,4-D often appear to be more effective than IAA in terms of induction of developmental responses ( Skůpa et al , 2014 ; Peterson et al , 2016 ), because both are less metabolized and 2,4-D is also less exported, as discussed above. Another interesting physiological difference between IAA and 2,4-D is that 2,4-D shows the highest activity on promoting cell division in suspension culture-grown tobacco BY-2 cells among the 12 auxinic compounds tested, including IAA, which surprisingly shows no stimulatory effect at all ( Simon et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Chemical Probes Targeting Auxin Perception Machinerymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The maximum root number and high rooting frequency was obtained on a ½ MS supplemented with 0.1 μM IBA, that allowed to consider the medium to be the best for in vitro rooting induction. [13], while "Heteroauxin" is the trade name for IAA, which is widely used in in vitro rooting microshoots [14]. The effectiveness of using pulsed treatment with auxin solutions followed by subsequent transfer to soil substrates for various woody plants has been proven many times: for Acer L., Betula L., Malus P. Mill.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, their growth and development processes require PGR, such as auxin and cytokinin, as well as other nutrients contained in the growing media. Auxin and cytokinin work synergistically in stimulating plant growth, hence IAA which is a type of auxin, IAA functions in regulating cell division and stimulating growth to ensure an increase in leaves number (Scarpella et al, 2010;Skupa et al, 2014). Auxin addition affects leaf growth, especially the vascular tissue's length (Aloni, 2010;Zazımalova et al, 2010).…”
Section: Plantlet Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%