2010
DOI: 10.1080/09593331003743112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autotrophic nitrogen‐removing biofilms on porous and non‐porous membranes

Abstract: The effective removal of nitrogen compounds from wastewater has become a critical issue for treatment plants as the awareness of their negative impact on the environment increased. Autotrophic nitrogen removal has become an interesting alternative to the more conventional heterotrophic processes, as it eliminates the need for an organic carbon addition to the source water and reduces biomass yields. Gas transfer membrane biofilm reactors (MBfR) for nitrification and hydrogen driven denitrification are of speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon can be more difficult to explain, as no difference between dissolved oxygen concentration in the outflows from both types of textile (6.1 ± 0.8 g/m 3 for TS 50 and 6.3 ± 0.6 g/m 3 ) was observed. The ammonium nitrogen removal could be related to the autotrophic nitrogen removal, which was reported in the literature for other (partially similar) conditions and systems [18,19].…”
Section: Ammonium Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This phenomenon can be more difficult to explain, as no difference between dissolved oxygen concentration in the outflows from both types of textile (6.1 ± 0.8 g/m 3 for TS 50 and 6.3 ± 0.6 g/m 3 ) was observed. The ammonium nitrogen removal could be related to the autotrophic nitrogen removal, which was reported in the literature for other (partially similar) conditions and systems [18,19].…”
Section: Ammonium Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The hydrogen-based MBfR has been studied extensively for treating nitrate (Celmer-Repin et al, 2010), and other oxidized contaminants, including perchlorate, bromate, chromate, selenite, and arsenate (Chung et al, 2007;Martin and Nerenberg, 2012;Nerenberg and Rittmann, 2004). Hydrogenbased MBfRs for the treatment of nitrate from drinking water have been tested at the pilot scale (Tang et al, 2010;Zhao et al, 2014), and a commercial system was operated in Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA (Martin and Nerenberg, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013 Several researchers have studied organics and nitrogen removal by oxygen-based MBfRs by developing or using variations of the concept proposed by Timberlake et al . ( 1988 ), and research in this area has been reviewed in several papers (Brindle and Stephenson, 1996 ;Casey et al ., 1999b ;Celmer-Repin et al ., 2010 ;Hwang et al ., 2009b ;Sun et al ., 2010 ;Syron and Casey, 2008a ;Wilderer, 1995 ). One example of innovative variation of the oxygen-based MBfRs is the sequencing batch MBfR developed by Terada et al .…”
Section: Oxygen-based Mbfrsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has also been combined with oxygen-based MBfRs for nitrifi cation followed by hydrogenotrophic denitrifi cation (Cowman et al ., 2005 ;Hwang et al ., 2009aHwang et al ., , 2010Shin et al ., 2005Shin et al ., , 2008Smith et al ., 2008 ). The development of hydrogenbased MBfRs is reviewed in three papers (Celmer-Repin et al ., 2010 ;Chung et al ., 2006a ;Rittmann et al ., 2004 ).…”
Section: Hydrogen-based Mbfrsmentioning
confidence: 97%