Automatic framework for patient-specific modelling of tumour resection-induced brain shift

Yu, Yue; Safdar, Saima; Bourantas, George C.; Zwick, Benjamin F.; Joldes, Grand Roman; Kapur, Tina; Frisken, Sarah; Kiknis, Ron; Nabavi, Arya; Golby, Alexandra J.; Wittek, Adam; Miller, Karol

doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105271

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include both technical (validation, testing, integration) and legal & ethical challenges (regulation, costs and access). However, increased numbers of experiences have been reporting the use of in silico tools in clinics (24)(25)(26)(27). This confirms a slow transformation which is likely to be happening in the real clinical world, but not necessarily captured timely by the literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the use of computational modelling and simulation in clinics: A survey

Lesage¹,

Oudheusden

Schievano

et al. 2023

Front. Med. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In silico medicine describes the application of computational modelling and simulation (CM&S) to the study, diagnosis, treatment or prevention of a disease. Tremendous research advances have been achieved to facilitate the use of CM&S in clinical applications. Nevertheless, the uptake of CM&S in clinical practice is not always timely and accurately reflected in the literature. A clear view on the current awareness, actual usage and opinions from the clinicians is needed to identify barriers and opportunities for the future of in silico medicine. The aim of this study was capturing the state of CM&S in clinics by means of a survey toward the clinical community. Responses were collected online using the Virtual Physiological Human institute communication channels, engagement with clinical societies, hospitals and individual contacts, between 2020 and 2021. Statistical analyses were done with R. Participants (n = 163) responded from all over the world. Clinicians were mostly aged between 35 and 64 years-old, with heterogeneous levels of experience and areas of expertise (i.e., 48% cardiology, 13% musculoskeletal, 8% general surgery, 5% paediatrics). The CM&S terms “Personalised medicine” and “Patient-specific modelling” were the most well-known within the respondents. “In silico clinical trials” and “Digital Twin” were the least known. The familiarity with different methods depended on the medical specialty. CM&S was used in clinics mostly to plan interventions. To date, the usage frequency is still scarce. A well-recognized benefit associated to CM&S is the increased trust in planning procedures. Overall, the recorded level of trust for CM&S is high and not proportional to awareness level. The main barriers appear to be access to computing resources, perception that CM&S is slow. Importantly, clinicians see a role for CM&S expertise in their team in the future. This survey offers a snapshot of the current situation of CM&S in clinics. Although the sample size and representativity could be increased, the results provide the community with actionable data to build a responsible strategy for accelerating a positive uptake of in silico medicine. New iterations and follow-up activities will track the evolution of responses over time and contribute to strengthen the engagement with the medical community.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%