Mapping the use of computational modelling and simulation in clinics: A survey

Abstract

In silico medicine describes the application of computational modelling and simulation (CM&S) to the study, diagnosis, treatment or prevention of a disease. Tremendous research advances have been achieved to facilitate the use of CM&S in clinical applications. Nevertheless, the uptake of CM&S in clinical practice is not always timely and accurately reflected in the literature. A clear view on the current awareness, actual usage and opinions from the clinicians is needed to identify barriers and opportunities for the future of in silico medicine. The aim of this study was capturing the state of CM&S in clinics by means of a survey toward the clinical community. Responses were collected online using the Virtual Physiological Human institute communication channels, engagement with clinical societies, hospitals and individual contacts, between 2020 and 2021. Statistical analyses were done with R. Participants (n = 163) responded from all over the world. Clinicians were mostly aged between 35 and 64 years-old, with heterogeneous levels of experience and areas of expertise (i.e., 48% cardiology, 13% musculoskeletal, 8% general surgery, 5% paediatrics). The CM&S terms “Personalised medicine” and “Patient-specific modelling” were the most well-known within the respondents. “In silico clinical trials” and “Digital Twin” were the least known. The familiarity with different methods depended on the medical specialty. CM&S was used in clinics mostly to plan interventions. To date, the usage frequency is still scarce. A well-recognized benefit associated to CM&S is the increased trust in planning procedures. Overall, the recorded level of trust for CM&S is high and not proportional to awareness level. The main barriers appear to be access to computing resources, perception that CM&S is slow. Importantly, clinicians see a role for CM&S expertise in their team in the future. This survey offers a snapshot of the current situation of CM&S in clinics. Although the sample size and representativity could be increased, the results provide the community with actionable data to build a responsible strategy for accelerating a positive uptake of in silico medicine. New iterations and follow-up activities will track the evolution of responses over time and contribute to strengthen the engagement with the medical community.

Advancing clinical translation of cardiac biomechanics models: a comprehensive review, applications and future pathways

“…However, only recently did these models start to generate compelling evidence of their clinical relevance, paving the way for their clinical translation. In [ 10 ], Lesage et al conducted a survey asking 163 clinicians about their familiarity with modelling and found that computational modelling-related terms such as patient-specific modelling are becoming well known. More than half of the responders had already used computer modelling and simulations to plan procedures, 57.4% of them in the cardiovascular field.…”

Verification Study of In Silico Computed Intracardiac Blood Flow With 4D Flow MRI

“…Another aspect is the complexity of the methods, being accompanied by high data requirements and demanding computational as well as expert resources. In a recent study by Lesage et al [16], a survey among clinicians associated the main barriers towards in silico medicine with computational resources and long computing times. In this context, cheaper, reduced CFD approaches, that e.g., make quasi-stationary assumptions [17], [18], may provide an adequate balance.…”

Investigation of the influence of intersystem shunt characteristics on hemodynamic parameters and oxygen distribution

“…Применение методов биомедицинского инжиниринга и математического моделирования позволяет получить количественные оценки гемодинамических показателей и спрогнозировать последствия хирургического вмешательства [9,10]. На сегодняшний день разработка объективизированных методик индивидуального подбора межсистемного шунта является актуальной проблемой, требующей новых подходов и методов [11].…”