2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl073801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated determination of magnitude and source length of large earthquakes using backprojection andPwave amplitudes

Abstract: Fast estimates of magnitude and source extent of large earthquakes are fundamental for disaster mitigation. However, resolving these estimates within 10–20 min after origin time remains challenging. Here we propose a robust algorithm to resolve magnitude and source length of large earthquakes using seismic data recorded by regional arrays and global stations. We estimate source length and source duration by backprojecting seismic array data. Then the source duration and the maximum amplitude of the teleseismic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting multi-array back-projection results are shown in Figures 2d-2f. According to the obtained HF source time function (Figure 2d) and the empirical method proposed by Wang et al (2017), the rupture duration was estimated to be 38 s. As shown in Figure 2e, the earthquake ruptured toward both east-southeast (ESE) and west-northwest (WNW). The ESE rupture propagated approximately 90 km away from the initial rupture point with an average velocity of 4.0 km/s which exceeds the 3.5-km/s local S wave velocity (Bassin et al, 2000).…”
Section: Multi-array Back-projection Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting multi-array back-projection results are shown in Figures 2d-2f. According to the obtained HF source time function (Figure 2d) and the empirical method proposed by Wang et al (2017), the rupture duration was estimated to be 38 s. As shown in Figure 2e, the earthquake ruptured toward both east-southeast (ESE) and west-northwest (WNW). The ESE rupture propagated approximately 90 km away from the initial rupture point with an average velocity of 4.0 km/s which exceeds the 3.5-km/s local S wave velocity (Bassin et al, 2000).…”
Section: Multi-array Back-projection Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the imaged spatiotemporal migration of the radiated high-frequency sources. According to the empirical method proposed by Wang et al (2017) and the high-frequency source time function as shown in Figure 2b, the lower limit of the rupture duration time is estimated to be approximately 53 s. The rupture process can be divided into three stages based on the spatiotemporal features (Figures 2c and 2d). In the first stage (0-14 s), the rupture propagated southeastward approximately 25 km away from the initial point and had an average velocity of 1.9 km/s.…”
Section: Backprojection Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back projections of the rupture line source [17] and estimates of early warning [18] may become available in near-real-time. This will replace the need to rely on aftershocks to estimate the rupture direction and length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%