2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2812-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of anomalies in cervix cells using image analysis and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer-assisted diagnosis is believed to ease this situation because it can potentially lower the misdiagnosis rate and also reduce the workload of cytologists [ 100 ]. Therefore, several studies have addressed the subject of automatic cervical cancer diagnosis [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 74 , 75 , 80 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 ]. The investigations showed that AI-assisted methods were promising, and achieved a high sensitivity and specificity in clinical cervical cytological screening [ 66 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-assisted diagnosis is believed to ease this situation because it can potentially lower the misdiagnosis rate and also reduce the workload of cytologists [ 100 ]. Therefore, several studies have addressed the subject of automatic cervical cancer diagnosis [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 74 , 75 , 80 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 ]. The investigations showed that AI-assisted methods were promising, and achieved a high sensitivity and specificity in clinical cervical cytological screening [ 66 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I It was determined that 1,2,3 and 4 were the four most reliable indicators for detecting and predicting malignancy [100]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%