1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auto/Autograph

Abstract: We describe the Auto and Autograph tools for verification and analysis of concurrent systems in their more recent developments. Auto is dedicated to a philosophy of verification by reduction, based on automata morphisms and quotients. Autograph provides a graphical layout on which to display both terms and informations on terms, back and forth to Auto. We stress the openness aspects of both systems and their interface formats to the outside world. We see this as a contribution to the ever growing collaborative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second approach, the specification is given as an automaton; then the system, also modeled as an automaton, is compared to the specification to determine whether its behavior conforms to that of the specification. Different notions of conformance have been explored, including language inclusion [Har'El and Kurshan 1990;Kurshan 1994a], refinement orderings [Cleaveland et al 1993;Roscoe 1994], and observational equivalence [Cleaveland et al 1993;Fernandez et al 1996;Roy and de Simone 1990]. Vardi and Wolper [1986] showed how the temporal-logic model-checking problem could be recast in terms of automata, thus relating these two approaches.…”
Section: Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second approach, the specification is given as an automaton; then the system, also modeled as an automaton, is compared to the specification to determine whether its behavior conforms to that of the specification. Different notions of conformance have been explored, including language inclusion [Har'El and Kurshan 1990;Kurshan 1994a], refinement orderings [Cleaveland et al 1993;Roscoe 1994], and observational equivalence [Cleaveland et al 1993;Fernandez et al 1996;Roy and de Simone 1990]. Vardi and Wolper [1986] showed how the temporal-logic model-checking problem could be recast in terms of automata, thus relating these two approaches.…”
Section: Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore much effort has been put into the research aiming at minimizing models. The methods include application of cone of influence reduction [1], semantic minimization [19], state information compression [10], abstraction techniques [6,13], partial order reductions [21,22], symmetry reductions [9], compositional techniques for splitting verification tasks [8,1], case-based partition techniques [14,23], and BDD based symbolic techniques for compactly representing transition relations and system states [5,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore much effort has been put into the research aiming at minimizing models. The methods include semantic minimization [17], abstraction techniques [11], partial order reductions [18], symmetry reductions [8], compositional techniques for splitting verification tasks [3], case-based partition techniques [13,21], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%