Authorship Trends, Collaboration Patterns, and Co-Authorship Networks in Lodging Studies (1990–2016)

Köseoğlu, Mehmet Ali; Okumuş, Fevzi; Putra, Eka Dıraksa; Yıldız, Mehmet; Doğan, İsmail

doi:10.1080/19368623.2018.1399192

Cited by 38 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Scientometrics relationally studies knowledge production, moving the author's gaze toward spatial and organizational co-authorship, as well as research field themes. In this text, the authors use the VOSviewer tool (Köseoglu et al, 2018 ; Lojo et al, 2019 ; González-Serrano et al, 2020 ; Vega-Muñoz et al, 2020 ) to perform a whole set of analysis of scientometric data about entrepreneurship wellbeing literature. Scientometrics allows us to strengthen systematic reviews (Porter et al, 2002 ), and it has been used recently in the field of Psychology (Caffò et al, 2020 ; Peng et al, 2020 ) and Business (Iandolo et al, 2019 ; Inkizhinov et al, 2021 ); its incorporation of sequential mixed use with PRISMA has also been addressed previously (Kazerani et al, 2017 ; Cavinatto et al, 2019 ; Sott et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Kullenberg and Kasperowski (2016), scientometrics meta-analysis examines the production of knowledge, its spatiality, and the relationship between the network of global actors (Moravcsik, 1985;Frenken et al, 2009;Albort-Morant et al, 2017;Vega-Muñoz and Salinas-Galindo, 2017;Mikhaylov et al, 2020). This study focuses on establishing levels of spatial, organizational, and thematic co-authorship using VOSviewer for entrepreneurial wellbeing knowledge production (Van Eck and Waltman, 2010;Köseoglu et al, 2018;Lojo et al, 2019;González-Serrano et al, 2020;Vega-Muñoz et al, 2020). Scientometrics is a study methodology within entrepreneurship studies and has been used previously by Shane and Venkataraman (2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding the number of authors which refer to the degree of co-authorship (Köseoglu, Okumus, Putra, Yildiz, & Dogan, 2018;Silva, Schulz, & Noyons, 2019), the most popular pattern of co-authorship is 2 or 3 authors (58.59%). Furthermore, a substantial increase occurred in the average number of authors during the whole period.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Jcem Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Between 2008 and 2018

Zhang

Antuchevičienė

2019

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Journal of Civil Engineering and Management (JCEM) is a prestigious international journal in the field of engineering. This paper uses the method of bibliometric to study the status and development trends of the journal. Information was collected from the Science Citation Index (SCI) database. Firstly, the general citation structure and basic characteristics of the JCEM journal are investigated. Then, the most influential institutions, countries as well as their networks of cooperation are identified. Finally, the main research topics of the JCEM journal are explored by using the frequently used keywords. This paper explores the internal structure and development trend of the JCEM journal, which not only provides an important reference for the future development of this journal, but also provides an effective analysis method for the future evaluation of journals.

show abstract

“…Co-authorship is a process in which two or more authors share their talents and sources by adopting one of the cooperation methods and begin a collaboration to create a scientific work. One method that is used in probing the co-authorship collaboration is drawing co-authorship networks and its analysis (Koseoglu, Okumus, Putra, Yildiz, & Dogan, 2018;Kumar, 2018;Sonnenwald, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Co-Authorship and Subject Areas Network in MOOCS’ Scientific Production in Web of Science

Asadzandi¹,

Mojtahedzadeh²,

Mohammadi³

et al. 2019

Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is a new phenomenon in online learning which are held by higher education institutions and universities. MOOCs is larger than normal classes and it is free as well. The present study aims to specify the authors' structure of co-authorship and the required indicators in analyzing co-authorship, co-authorship network of countries, organizations and subject areas in MOOCs. All productions regarding scientific areas of MOOCs were extracted from the Web of Science from the beginning till 2016. There are 2195 extracted documents that were saved as txt and isi formats. Co-authorship drawing networks were prepared by website software CiteSpace version 5.1.R8 SE and Gephi version 0.9.2. MOOCs co-authorship network is regarded as spare that means the number of ties is less than nodes. This indicates that authors in this area have fewer tendencies for scientific relations. European countries play the main role in this area and their co-authorship is considerable. Harvard University has considerable co-authorship in this domain. According to the results of this study, MOOCs' network suffers from the lack of collaboration.

show abstract

Authorship Trends, Collaboration Patterns, and Co-Authorship Networks in Lodging Studies (1990–2016)

Cited by 38 publications

References 63 publications

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Between 2008 and 2018

The Co-Authorship and Subject Areas Network in MOOCS’ Scientific Production in Web of Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About