Auditory dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor versus good glycemic control

Abo-Elfetoh, Noha; Mohamed, Enass Sayed; Tag, Lubna M; El-Baz, Mona A.H.; Eldeen, Manal E Ez

doi:10.4103/1012-5574.161603

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…BAEP wave was recorded twice in each ear to ensure uniformity of the wave generated. This examination method was similar to other earlier studies [9], [14], [18].…”

Section: Baep Latency Differences In Diabetic Patients With Good and supporting

confidence: 69%

“…BAEP examination is done with the same intensity as our study. This study found significant latency elongation of the waves V, IPL I-III, and III-V in poor glycemic control group [14], [23]. However, this study includes samples with age range of 32-70 years old.…”

Section: Baep Latency Differences In Diabetic Patients With Good and mentioning

confidence: 71%

“…Most of the study subjects suffered from DM with duration of fewer than 5 years (58.75%) while subjects who suffered from DM for 5-10 years as much as 41.25%. The same period was also used in previous studies [9], [14]. Most of the research similar take samples of DM patients with the duration of the disease more than 10 years [8], [11], [16], [18], while Gupta et al (2010) use the duration range suffered DM less than 5 years in the sample research [27].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Abo-Elfetoh et al (2015), patients with poor glycemic control had prolonged absolute BAEP latency which is significant from wave I with the extension followed by wave latency III and V; also IPL III-V compared to the control group (healthy individuals) [14]. This may indicate the involvement of both peripheral and central auditory pathways.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Until now, various studies that perform BAEP examination in patients with DM used a healthy individual as control [9], [14], [16], [18], [22], [23], [24], while in this study we compare BAEP results in patients with DM only.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Difference of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Latency in Diabetic Patient with Good and Poor Glycemic Control

Samatra¹,

Meliana²,

Putra³

et al. 2020

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder which may complicate other organs, including the nervous system. Literatures which discuss about DM complications in the peripheral nervous system are easy to find but not so many of the central nervous system. Central diabetic neuropathy is a new concept which could be detected by a simple and non-invasive method, called brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP). AIM: The aim of the study was to find differences in BAEP latencies of a diabetic patient with good and poor glycemic control. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 80 patients who came for follow-up in diabetic center and neurology polyclinic at Sanglah Hospital, from April to July 2016. The subjects were divided into two groups, depending on their glycemic control, then having BAEP examination. RESULTS: The unpaired t-test found prolonged BAEP latencies (either peak latency of wave III, V, IPL I-III, III-V, and I-V) in both ears at the poor glycemic control group, but the results were not differed significantly (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: BAEP wave latencies were found prolonged in DM patient with poor glycemic control but not statistically significant. Further evaluation of BAEP latencies in DM patients is needed with prolonged duration and their relation with other comorbid factors, especially smoking habit.

show abstract

“…BAEP wave was recorded twice in each ear to ensure uniformity of the wave generated. This examination method was similar to other earlier studies [9], [14], [18].…”

Section: Baep Latency Differences In Diabetic Patients With Good and supporting

confidence: 69%

Section: Baep Latency Differences In Diabetic Patients With Good and mentioning

confidence: 71%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Difference of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Latency in Diabetic Patient with Good and Poor Glycemic Control

Samatra¹,

Meliana²,

Putra³

et al. 2020

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Diabetes-induced cellular changes in the inner ear

Gedawy,

Al-Salami,

Dass

2024

Diabetes Epidemiology and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Características audiológicas de pacientes com diabetes mellitus Tipo 2

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: to identify the audiological characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Cross-sectional study in secondary care unit for diabetes in Fortaleza, April-July 2010. The sample comprised 152 patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of sex, between 36 and 60 years of age. Held pure tone audiometry (PTA), transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE).Results: association of age and time of diagnosis with hearing loss, and the time of diagnosis with the absence of DPOAE. It was observed sensorineural hearing loss in 63.2% of patients, which 71.9% were bilateral and 75% symmetric. Approximately 50% of hearing loss had flat configuration. TOAEs were absent in 75% of the patients and DPOAE in 78.9%. There were no otoacoustic emissions in the presence of normal PTA, on average, 32% of the patients on the right and 48% on the left. The presence of otoacoustic emissions on the occurrence of hearing loss was observed in approximately 30% of patients for TEOAE and 14% for DPOAE on the right; and 25% for TEOAE and 11% for DPOAE on the left. Conclusions: Prevalence of symmetrical bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with a flat configuration, and absence of TEOAE and DPOAE. The association analysis of the results of PTA and OAE suggests loss of outer hair cells of the cochlea or possible auditory neuropathy. These findings justify the hearing monitoring of these patients, as well as conducting specific tests to evaluate the central auditory system. Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hearing; Evaluation; Audiometry; Cochlea RESUMO Objetivo: identificar as características audiológicas de pacientes com diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Métodos: estudo transversal, realizado em unidade de atenção secundária para diabetes em Fortaleza, de abril a julho de 2010. Amostra composta por 152 pacientes diabéticos tipo 2, independente do sexo, entre 36 e 60 anos. Realizou-se audiometria tonal liminar (ATL), emissões otoacústicas evocadas por estímulo transiente (EOAT) e emissões otoacústicas evocadas-produto de distorção (EOAPD). Resultados: associação da idade e do tempo de diagnóstico com a presença de perda auditiva, e do tempo de diagnóstico com a ausência de EOAPD. Observou-se perda auditiva sensorioneural em 63,2% dos pacientes, das quais 71,9% eram bilaterais e 75% simétricas. Aproximadamente, 50% das perdas auditivas apresentaram configuração plana. As EOAT estavam ausentes em 75% dos pacientes e as EOAPD em 78,9%. Houve ausência de emissões otoacústicas na presença de ATL normal, em média, em 32% dos pacientes à direita e 48% à esquerda. Já a presença de emissões otoacústicas na ocorrência de perda auditiva foi observada em, aproximadamente, 30% dos pacientes para EOAT e 14% para EOAPD à direita; e 25% para EOAT e 11% para EOAPD à esquerda. Conclusão: predomínio de perda auditiva sensorioneural bilateral simétrica com configuração plana, e ausência de EOAT e EOAPD. A análise da associação dos resultados da ATL e das emissões otoacústicas sugere...

show abstract

Auditory dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor versus good glycemic control

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

The Difference of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Latency in Diabetic Patient with Good and Poor Glycemic Control

The Difference of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Latency in Diabetic Patient with Good and Poor Glycemic Control

Diabetes-induced cellular changes in the inner ear

Características audiológicas de pacientes com diabetes mellitus Tipo 2

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About