2000
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200006000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical Reexcision Perineural Invasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They termed the lesion reexcision perineural invasion and proposed the following guidelines for its diagnosis: absence of perineural spread beyond the immediate previous biopsy site, benign appearance of the perineural epithelial cells different from the appearance of the original tumor, and absence of residual epithelial tumor in the vicinity of the involved perineurium. Recently Wu et al [23] reported a similar but not identical case in which a focus of perineural invasion by a nest of atypical squamous epithelium was observed in a reexcision specimen in which an earlier biopsy showed a scar. Because of the epithelial atypia, Stern and Haupt [24] felt that a diagnosis of reexcision perineural invasion was not reliable in that case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…They termed the lesion reexcision perineural invasion and proposed the following guidelines for its diagnosis: absence of perineural spread beyond the immediate previous biopsy site, benign appearance of the perineural epithelial cells different from the appearance of the original tumor, and absence of residual epithelial tumor in the vicinity of the involved perineurium. Recently Wu et al [23] reported a similar but not identical case in which a focus of perineural invasion by a nest of atypical squamous epithelium was observed in a reexcision specimen in which an earlier biopsy showed a scar. Because of the epithelial atypia, Stern and Haupt [24] felt that a diagnosis of reexcision perineural invasion was not reliable in that case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For the diagnosis of RPI, they recommended specific criteria: perineural involvement should be limited to the immediate previous biopsy site, perineural epithelial cells should reveal well‐differentiated tissue different from the appearance of the original neoplasm and no residual neoplastic epithelial cells should be present adjacent to the neuroepithelial lesion 12 . According to these criteria, Stern and Haupt 13 rejected the suggestion of Wu et al that cytological atypia may be seen in RPI 14 . ESN can be differentiated from RPI by the absence of history of local excision and the lack of any evidence of scarring in histological sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei perineural liegenden epithelialen Zellen in einem Nachexzidat muss auch an das Vorliegen von artifiziell um Nerven angeordnete Adnexstrukturen gedacht werden ("reexcision perineural invasion") [52]. Beschrieben wurden dabei 2 Fälle mit vorausgegangener Exzision von melanozytären Neoplasien.Es fanden sich S100-negative neurotrope epitheliale Zellen, die vermutlich von den in der Nähe liegenden Schweißdrüsen stammten [52,61].Die regelrechte Zytologie der Epithelien ließ einen malignen Prozess ausschließen.Eine weitere histologische Differenzialdiagnose ist das seltene "epithelial sheath neuroma",das aus hyperplastischen,in der oberen Dermis liegenden Nervenbündeln aufgebaut ist,die eine epitheliale Hülle aufweisen [30,48,62].…”
Section: Fallunclassified