2009
DOI: 10.28945/427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes and the Digital Divide: Attitude Measurement as Instrument to Predict Internet Usage

Abstract: Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are the most important way of getting informed in our society. Unfortunately not all people have access to the internet and ICTs (first order digital divide), and an amazingly large number of people do not have the abilities to use the ICTs in a proper way and, therefore, cannot draw advantages from its usage (second order digital divide). Clearly, whether people can be informed or not depends on access to the new media and the ability to use them. This paper s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
25
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Younger people had a high probability of being the Internet users, compared to older people. Education also had a strong influence on the Internet usage (Donat, Brandtweiner, & Kerschbaum, 2009). Younger people viewed these media more credible than older people.…”
Section: Differences Between Full-time Students and Full-time Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger people had a high probability of being the Internet users, compared to older people. Education also had a strong influence on the Internet usage (Donat, Brandtweiner, & Kerschbaum, 2009). Younger people viewed these media more credible than older people.…”
Section: Differences Between Full-time Students and Full-time Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the socio-economic impact of the digital divide is not new (Husing & Selhofer, 2002) with a number of studies focusing on the speed of ICT adoption; abilities to use ICTs and its attendant benefits; and attitudes related to adoption and usage (Donat, Brandtweiner, & Kerschbaum, 2009). However, the digital divide persists and in developing countries where the impact is greater, the concern is that these countries are not only falling behind, but also falling apart (Collier, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, as an implementation proceeds, their attitudes form, strengthen (Kim et al 2009) and, playing an increasingly important role (Lee 2011), can cause a system to be accepted or resisted (Alsajjan & Dennis 2010;Angst & Agarwal 2004;Donat et al 2009;Kim et al 2009;Lee 2011;Zhang & Sun 2009). System champions are advised, therefore, to consider how the HAPI outlined in this paper might be affecting their users and, given that established attitudes are less susceptible to change (for example Brock & Balloun 1967;Batson 1975;Frey 1986;Burris, Harmon-Jones & Tarpley 1997), to do so from a user's first encounter onwards.…”
Section: Conclusion and The Hierarchical Hapi Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%