1973
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820070303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment of prostheses to the musculo‐skeletal system by tissue ingrowth and mechanical interlocking

Abstract: SummaryThe concept of tissue ingrowth into porous biomaterials as a means of attaching prostheses to the musculo-skeletal system is reviewed. A compilation of the various ceramic materials studied in vivo to date along with the results of the studies is presented. Results of studies on kinetics of tissue ingrowth into porous biomaterials are summarized. A discussion of the parameters controlling the rate of tissue ingrowth into porous implants is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 For anchoring load-bearing implants within the skeletal system, biological fixation of implants by active bone growth onto surfaces or into porous surface structures has long been applied. 2 Particularly, titanium (Ti) dental implants have been widely used clinically and experimentally to provide a structural and functional connection between ordered living bone and the surface of load-carrying implants. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] As long as there is stable and adequate surface structure in implants, woven bone ongrowth will lead to subsequent mechanical and biological fixation of implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 For anchoring load-bearing implants within the skeletal system, biological fixation of implants by active bone growth onto surfaces or into porous surface structures has long been applied. 2 Particularly, titanium (Ti) dental implants have been widely used clinically and experimentally to provide a structural and functional connection between ordered living bone and the surface of load-carrying implants. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] As long as there is stable and adequate surface structure in implants, woven bone ongrowth will lead to subsequent mechanical and biological fixation of implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For soft tissue, a large pore size (approximately 900 pm) provided an optimal peeloff strength when the soft tissue was mechanically torn away from the metal surface (18). Anchorage of prostheses to bone by bone ingrowth occurred in a large variety of porous coatings, in different materials, and under different loading conditions (2,3, 8,11,12,14,19,24). The initial fixation strength of tendons to bone with and without a bone block has been studied widely (9,17,20,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimum pore size for bone ingrowth is 100 lm, whereas pore size more than 200 lm facilitates development of mature osteon [12]. Level of porosity should be larger than 50-60 %, the minimal interconnection size should be larger than 50-100 lm and the mean pore size should be between 100 and 500 lm [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%