2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic delocalization as a microscopic origin of two-level defects in Josephson junctions

Abstract: Identifying the microscopic origins of decoherence sources prevalent in Josephson junction (JJ) based circuits is central to their use as functional quantum devices. Focussing on so called 'strongly coupled' two-level defects, we construct a theoretical model using the atomic position of the oxygen which is spatially delocalized in the oxide forming the JJ barrier. Using this model, we investigate which atomic configurations give rise to two-level behaviour of the type seen in experiments. We compute experimen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural and nanochemical properties of AlOx layers have a significant influence on the performance of these devices. For example, AlOx-layer thickness variations and structural defects in AlOx-tunnel barriers of JJs cause noise and limit the detection sensitivity of superconducting interference devices and coherence times in quantum bits [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural and nanochemical properties of AlOx layers have a significant influence on the performance of these devices. For example, AlOx-layer thickness variations and structural defects in AlOx-tunnel barriers of JJs cause noise and limit the detection sensitivity of superconducting interference devices and coherence times in quantum bits [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These suggestions include tunneling between inversion symmetric (e.g. examples A and B in figure 1 of [48]) and inversion asymmetric (e.g. example C in figure 1 of [48]) states.…”
Section: Experimental Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…examples A and B in figure 1 of [48]) and inversion asymmetric (e.g. example C in figure 1 of [48]) states. Since defect-phonon coupling in amorphous solids is expected to be an order of magnitude larger than in disordered crystals [26,[50][51][52], our results suggest that the tunneling amplitude of inversion asymmetric TLSs, such as in example C in figure 1 of [48] for KCl (from [56]) and the geometry factor [23] is = f 1 5 t .…”
Section: Experimental Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations