2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9299-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atom Surprise: Using Theatre in Primary Science Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Peleg andBaramTsabari (2011), Nwadigwe (2007), and Elliott et al (1996) pointed out the same result; the theatre method is an effective way in order to get knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peleg andBaramTsabari (2011), Nwadigwe (2007), and Elliott et al (1996) pointed out the same result; the theatre method is an effective way in order to get knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Different theatre scripts or assessment methods may be used according to the research aims in further research. For instance Peleg andBaram-Tsabari (2011), andNwadigwe (2007) used mixed methodology and it helped to evaluate the results more deeply. The children should have critical and analytical thinking abilities about the biodiversity and human effects on the natural environment because the biodiversity is an interdisciplinary subject (Sarabhai, 2011;Dervisoglu, Menzel, Soran, & Bogeholz, 2009;Dervisoglu, 2007;Barker & Elliot, 2000;Agenda 21, UN, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we (Peleg and Baram-Tsabari 2011) investigated the learning outcomes of an educational science play on the topic of matter for children aged 6-12. The play was presented at two different schools, and data were collected using questionnaires and interviews.…”
Section: Research On Science Museum Theatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…679-699). Previous studies have mainly focused on viewers' learning outcomes, with findings showing positive cognitive and affective outcomes (Baum and Hughes 2001;Hughes 2008;Peleg and Baram-Tsabari 2011). However, little is known about how such cognitive and affective outcomes are related to the intentions of the writers and producers of such educational plays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os estudos que, na nossa concepção, adequadamente fazem uso dos jogos e/ou da abordagem contextual apontam que tanto a ludicidade quanto a história contribuem para a aprendizagem do conhecimento científico (BENEDETTI-FILHO;CAVALHEIRO, 2006;FRANCO-MARISCAL;CANO-IGLESIAS, 2009;PELEG;BARAM-TSABARI, 2011;HEERING, 2000;SEKER, H.;WELCH, L.C, 2006). Cremos que, do ponto de vista da pesquisa, já superamos a fase da constatação da relevância e eficácia da ludicidade e da abordagem contextual, uma vez que já há estudos suficientes que apontem para o sucesso dessas propostas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified