2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and spinal degenerative disease: evidence from a meta-analysis based on 35 case-control studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 studies were included in the meta-analysis: three studies for IL-1A (rs1800587), 19,42,43 two studies for TNF-A (rs361525), 19,44 and nine studies for VDR (rs731236). 28,42,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51] The summary of studies included in the meta-analysis is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Eligibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 studies were included in the meta-analysis: three studies for IL-1A (rs1800587), 19,42,43 two studies for TNF-A (rs361525), 19,44 and nine studies for VDR (rs731236). 28,42,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51] The summary of studies included in the meta-analysis is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Eligibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vieira et al found a dependence between FokI polymorphism, T to C in the VDR, and IDD in an investigation of 121 Brazilian men [7]. FokI polymorphisms and IDD [30]. The observed discrepancy between the above-stated results might be due to variations in sample size, ethnicity, and differences in the design of the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then, the chi-square test was used to determine statistically significant SNPs. Analysis of a genetic association was estimated under five different models (allelic, dominant, recessive, heterozygous and homozygous) using SPSS 21.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) [ 26 ]. In screening for SNPs with statistically significant differences, P values < 0.01 in two-tailed test were considered statistically significant, for other statistical analyses, P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%