1968
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0470232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Among Beta Backscatter Measurements and Other Measures of Shell Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the initial work of and Wilson et al (1968), the beta backscatter reading was used to pre-estimate the height from which a ball was dropped to break the shell. This measure of the shell strength was found to be highly correlated with beta backscatter which also provided an estimate of the shell thickness.…”
Section: Non-destructive Beta Backscattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the initial work of and Wilson et al (1968), the beta backscatter reading was used to pre-estimate the height from which a ball was dropped to break the shell. This measure of the shell strength was found to be highly correlated with beta backscatter which also provided an estimate of the shell thickness.…”
Section: Non-destructive Beta Backscattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then a number of workers have used the same or similar methods, e.g. a steel ball or similar object dropping from increasing heights (Swenson and James, 1932;Hale, 1954;Mueller, 1957;Tyler and Geake, 1963;Franket al, 1964;Jamesand Retzer, 1967;Wilson et al, 1968), steel balls ascending in size dropped from a fixed height (Bennett, 1961 ;Bowman and Challender 1963;Wells, 1967a) or a steel ball dropped repeatedly from a fixed height (Tyler and Geake, 1964a, b, c). Several sophisticated instruments have been designed to speed up this type of impact test, such as the 'Bomber' described by Bennett (1961) which drops a series of balls from a fixed height on to the shell.…”
Section: Impact Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other nondestructive techniques have been previously described in this journal (James and Retzer, 1967;Wilson et al, 1968), but they, in general, are non-portable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%