2013
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.112382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted reproduction in polycystic ovarian disease: A multicentric trial in India

Abstract: AIM:The aim of this study is to compare ovarian response, oocyte, embryo quality, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome incidence, and pregnancy rates in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS group.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This was a prospective observational study on PCOS carried out in seven assisted reproduction centers in India between August 2008 and July 2010, as part of trial under the Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction. A total of 192 women (77 in the PCOS group and 115 in the non- PCOS group) un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) represent the third line of treatment when lifestyle modification and the use of drugs to induce monofollicular ovulation fail; however, controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) in PCOS patients represents a challenge for fertility expert and the major complication remain ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) [6,7]. Additionally, although a great number of oocytes may be retrieved at ovarian pick-up; there are concerns about quality and maturity of these oocytes [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In our experience, in accordance with recent literature [16], ovarian response to ovarian stimulation vary widely among POCS patients and while some patients are more likely to show resistance to COH, other experienced an exaggerated response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) represent the third line of treatment when lifestyle modification and the use of drugs to induce monofollicular ovulation fail; however, controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) in PCOS patients represents a challenge for fertility expert and the major complication remain ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) [6,7]. Additionally, although a great number of oocytes may be retrieved at ovarian pick-up; there are concerns about quality and maturity of these oocytes [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In our experience, in accordance with recent literature [16], ovarian response to ovarian stimulation vary widely among POCS patients and while some patients are more likely to show resistance to COH, other experienced an exaggerated response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with PCOS are typically more difficult to stimulate in a controlled manner, whether the intention is to induce a monofollicular or multifollicular response, are more likely to demonstrate resistance to stimulation and/or an exaggerated response and experience a higher cycle cancellation rate than women without PCOS. While a high number of oocytes may be obtained during ART, there are concerns that the quality and maturity of these oocytes may be compromised. Despite all this, live‐birth rates after ART in women with PCOS seem to be comparable with those of women with other diagnoses, such as endometriosis, unexplained infertility or male factor infertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, target genes of DELs involved in oxidative stress were also enriched at the ZT20 stage ( Figure 4 b, Table S6 ). Thus, these findings indicated that oxidative stress and steroid regulation contribute to the ovulatory events [ 54 , 55 ] when the follicle reached the matured phase at the ZT20 stage. Furthermore, up-regulated DEGs at the ZT20 stage (LH surge stage) were also related to inflammatory processes, including acute inflammatory response to antigenic stimulus (GO:0002438), hallmark inflammatory response (M5932), and regulation of inflammatory response (GO:0050727) ( Figure 3 d,e, Table S4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%